View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Wed Jul 02, 2025 12:10 am
Time Machine - deleting Back Ups automatically?
Author |
Message |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
Hi
Does anyone here know much about how Time Machine works? I've recently bought a new external drive for my files, leaving me with the old 1TB which I thought ideal for Time Machine for my work iMac. First back up fine, but now won;t back up again, as it says there's no space. I'd assumed it would just delete any old back up to get the latest one on?
My iMac is 1TB also (running Mavericks), with around 650gb used - is that just too much to use a 1TB back up drive? On some Apple forums saying it needs about 20% free space over the size of the actual back up to perform, but mine's within that? Does it have to keep at least one other back up?
Any ideas? If it won't work I may just try the back up software bundled on the Western drive.
Thanks!
Ben
_________________Blueneck
|
Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:24 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
That's how TM has always worked for me and unless you're changing a lot of data on the iMac often, it shouldn't have any problems with a drive that's only 2/3 full at the start. If you go to System preferences and look in the Time Machine settings, what does it say in there?
|
Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:13 pm |
|
 |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
Well, it's my work one, so changing most of the time, but I can't really avoid that.
TM settings say there's only 27gb left, and the estimated size of a full back up is 653gb - but do I assume following ones are not 'full' but files that have 'changed'??
... the only thing I can think is that I messed things up a bit was when I had to do the initial back-up as I had to keep stop-starting it - might that have bloated it unnecessarily?! Should I wipe and start again perhaps?
_________________Blueneck
|
Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:20 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
Yup. I think it does a new full backup every so often but the ones it does every hour are just the changes. if it says there's only 27GB left on the drive with only 650GB of data on the source, that certainly doesn't sound quite right. At this point a wipe of the backup drive doesn't really cost you much other than time...
|
Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:44 pm |
|
 |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
I'll try that then, and just make sure the first back up goes uninterrupted - I may leave it going over night, seeing as it does take rather a long time!
Thanks!
_________________Blueneck
|
Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:49 pm |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|

I've never had any luck with TimeMachine. After rebuilding my iMac, TimeMachine promptly erased the backup disk faster than it was copying the original data back! Luckily I had a separate backup on a NAS and on Carbonite cloud backup.
Then, it would always say that it couldn't perform a backup, no error message, other than backup failed (it would perform the initial backup, then refuse to backup after that). Reformatting the drive didn't have any effect, it would backup the first time, then say that it failed every time it tried to do an incremental backup.
I gave up in the end. As all my data is backed up by script to a NAS and it is on Carbonite, I just switched TimeMachine off. I've now switched to Carbonite on my Windows PC, plus NAS, plus external drive with File History Backup (Windows version of TimeMachine) and SyncToy to sync with the iMac.
TimeMachine is great (when it works) for recovering accidentally deleted files or going back to previous versions, but it isn't a full backup system on its own. (The 3-2-1 rule - no files exists, until there are 3 copies, on 2 different media, with 1 copy offsite).
If the system gets stolen, then the backup drive is likely to disappear with it. If there is a fire and it destroys the Macs hard drive, then it will probably destroy the external drive as well. If the data is really valuable to you / the company, then make sure you invest in a proper backup as well - syncing with the servers, which will (or should) have an off-site backup should be the initial stage. If the company doesn't have any form of disaster recovery or off-site backups (storing tapes in bank vaults etc.), then they really should think about getting their act together.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:29 pm |
|
 |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
Thanks - yeah, this is literally just backing up "the iMac" - all my work is stored on the server, which is backed up off-site. I just wanted a back-up of the iMac in case any thing happened to it specifically, so it might speed up recovery/getting me back working again.
Been trying again, but not too successful yet.
Is it normal for the initial TM back-up to quite so slow? Started it again this morning, at about 9.30, and it's only on 79gb of 750gb?! That's over FireWire 800 too....
I may try the bundled Western back up instead maybe, or look for a third party one.... Am I right in thinking Carbon Copy Cloner can be used for back up??
_________________Blueneck
|
Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:20 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
Yep, although I personally use Superduper (as linked earlier). Does the same thing and is free for personal use.
|
Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:55 pm |
|
 |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
Of course, yes. Scheduling is on the paid version, but may well be worth it! Thanks for reminding me!
_________________Blueneck
|
Fri Jan 24, 2014 2:05 pm |
|
 |
davrosG5
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am Posts: 6954 Location: Peebo
|
Bear in mind that there have been fairly widespread reports of problems with (mainly) Western Digitals drives and Mavericks (drives contents being rendered invisible). The problems seemed to be related to the WD software bundle. Not sure if 10.9.1 fixed it or not or if WD have updated their software. Drives that have only been formatted with Disk Utility seem to be having fewer problems. I use the paid for version of SuperDuper! myself for cloning the hard drive. Never used CCC but I gather that those who do use it are generally as happy with it as SuperDuper! users are with their choice. An initial TM backup can take a fair amount of time yes but that does seem rather excessive.
_________________ When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum. -Billy Connolly (to a heckler)
|
Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:31 am |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
I have had those sorts of problems but have not installed the Western Digital software.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:04 pm |
|
 |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
Yeah, Western have updated the software. I didn't try and use the drive in that period just in case, but have installed their updaters and all is well. I have one at home also which I'd forgotten to do, and had a panic when the drive appeared to be empty, but installed the updates and all was returned to normal.
I may wipe the drive and give TM one more go, as ideally I'd like to use that, if not I think I'll cough up for SuperDuper, or see what the Western back-up is like.
Thanks again for the replies guys!
_________________Blueneck
|
Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:56 am |
|
 |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
I've been using the drive's built in software to wipe the drive, but I wonder, would using disk utility be a better option? Sure I read somewhere that part of the Western drive couldn't be deleted as it was protected, to keep that software on there?
_________________Blueneck
|
Mon Jan 27, 2014 9:41 am |
|
 |
paulzolo
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm Posts: 12251
|
I have a WD drive, use it for Time Machine and have had no problems. I’ve never used supplied software that comes with a drive - I just wiped the thing in Disk Utility.
|
Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:10 pm |
|
 |
zerodeluxe
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:16 am Posts: 245
|
Well, tried a disk utility wipe this time... the Western one kept freezing....
_________________Blueneck
|
Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:26 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|