Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Thinking About Formatting. 
Author Message
Has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:35 pm
Posts: 43
Reply with quote
Ello,

As there is no "Other Crap Go Here" part of the forum I'm going to post this here.

Anyway, I need to format my computer soon as the space that's on it isn't being used very well. I want to formatt my 500gb as this;

20gb - Windows XP
20Gb x 4 for other OS's
Example;
20gb - Window XP
20gb - Gentoo
20gb - OSX (If I ever get it to work).
20gb x 2 - Blank for other.
400Gb - My docs (I do alot of video now, not well but I do it)

Would that at all work? I just wouldn't mind learning other OS's as "I know windows XP" is going to get to the point where it just isn't going to cut it. So having a wider skill set would be handy. So would my genius plan work?

On an entirely different topic that I'm throwing in now for the hell of it. Is alot meant to be spelt with two L's or one? Seems wrong with two to me.

Ta folks.


Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:31 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
That should work, but the data would then need to be FAT32 to be useable by all operating systems... Which limits you to less than 4GB for data files (DVD ISO images, HD films etc. would be a problem.

To be honest, these days I'd make a single large partition (or an OS partition and data partition and install the virtual operating systems as virtual machines. It is much more practical. I tried multi-boot for a while, but found I was always in the wrong operating system for the task I was about to perform, so save everything, reboot, do task, realise I need the other OS again, save, reboot ad infinitum. :( Virtual Machines are much better, especially for testing. Install your main OS (the one you are likely to use the most), then set up VMs for the rest.

I use either Vista or OS X as my host OSes (I have a Windows machine and an iMac) and then I have XP and Linux as guest OSes under that.

I really wouldn't bother with OS X on a Windows PC. If you want to try it, get a second hand Mac. If you really want to try it on a generic PC, got the EFix module and buy the hardware that is supported. Installing it on a generic PC without 100% compatible parts is just an exercise in frustration.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:03 am
Profile ICQ
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 1171
Reply with quote
I am pretty sure there is a limit to how many partitions one drive can have under windows, I think 3 is the number. So your XP might be little bit freaked out, don't know about linux but I guess they are going to be ok with it...

_________________
Image
Free Sim with £5 credit


Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:25 am
Profile
Has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:35 pm
Posts: 43
Reply with quote
Hmm, I'll make a partition for Virtual computer drives then.

Currently they are sort of scattered about somewhat.

Cheers Big_D


Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:38 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
VMWare gives you a couple of options too.

Each machine can have it's own drive partition, or it can have a massive image file which it uses for it's drive.

Giving each machine it's own partition might be a good idea. I do it on my Mac, and that way I can either boot into Windows, or run it through VMWare which is cool and very very handy. Dunno how easy this is to setup on a PC though.

_________________
Image


Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:56 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Using virtual drives is a better use of space. You don't need to set aside any space, so it will only use what it needs, so if an install needs 2GB space, it will take 2GB or less actual HD space, if you then need to put in another 10GB, it will expand as needed. (This might depend on the VM software you are using.)

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:42 pm
Profile ICQ
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
That should work, but the data would then need to be FAT32 to be useable by all operating systems... Which limits you to less than 4GB for data files (DVD ISO images, HD films etc. would be a problem.


Linux support for NTFS is pretty stable now, so best stick with NTFS for most of it and EXT3 or EXT4 for Gentoo and install NFTS-3G to access the docs on the NTFS partition.

VM's are a better option, as everyone else says. I'm using VirtualBox 3 on my Raincoat and it does the job and it is free. VMWare Server is pretty good on Windows though and it was also free last time I looked.

_________________
G.


Last edited by gavomatic57 on Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:39 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
Using virtual drives is a better use of space. You don't need to set aside any space, so it will only use what it needs, so if an install needs 2GB space, it will take 2GB or less actual HD space, if you then need to put in another 10GB, it will expand as needed. (This might depend on the VM software you are using.)


Yeah but who cares?

Drives are cheap!!

_________________
Image


Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:41 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
big_D wrote:
Using virtual drives is a better use of space. You don't need to set aside any space, so it will only use what it needs, so if an install needs 2GB space, it will take 2GB or less actual HD space, if you then need to put in another 10GB, it will expand as needed. (This might depend on the VM software you are using.)


Yeah but who cares?

Drives are cheap!!


True

Bought a 1.5TB hard drive for drive images and media storage for £75 on Saturday

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:06 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
big_D wrote:
Using virtual drives is a better use of space. You don't need to set aside any space, so it will only use what it needs, so if an install needs 2GB space, it will take 2GB or less actual HD space, if you then need to put in another 10GB, it will expand as needed. (This might depend on the VM software you are using.)


Yeah but who cares?

Drives are cheap!!

Depends what you call cheap...Even a 50 quid drive is beyond a lot of people as a justifiable upgrade price. ;)

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:10 am
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
Nick wrote:
big_D wrote:
Using virtual drives is a better use of space. You don't need to set aside any space, so it will only use what it needs, so if an install needs 2GB space, it will take 2GB or less actual HD space, if you then need to put in another 10GB, it will expand as needed. (This might depend on the VM software you are using.)


Yeah but who cares?

Drives are cheap!!

Depends what you call cheap...Even a 50 quid drive is beyond a lot of people as a justifiable upgrade price. ;)


Speaking as someone with a wife and three kids, I couldn't agree more. :roll:

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:14 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 446
Location: ~/
Reply with quote
koli wrote:
I am pretty sure there is a limit to how many partitions one drive can have under windows, I think 3 is the number. So your XP might be little bit freaked out, don't know about linux but I guess they are going to be ok with it...


I think you're talking about primary partitions and you can have a maximum of four on a disk. You can sub-partition the primary partitions to get around the limit.

_________________
I was nickholway on the old boards.


Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:16 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.