Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Google Chrome 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Is anyone using Google Chrome web browser? I read an article today giving benchmark figures into how much quicker it is than IE and Firefox. Admittedly they were Google's own benchmarks but an independent test still put it ahead of the other browsers. I thought I'd give it a go then.

TBH it does seem faster. A lot faster than my current browser at work (IE7 :lol: ) in fact. I'm going to test it at home tonight too where I normally use Firefox.

Funnily enough the colour scheme is blue matching our lovely forum too!

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Fri May 22, 2009 1:26 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Yes been using Chrome to a limited extent since it first came out. Its much faster in my opinion that anything else.

Sadly its, currently, lacking the plug ins I rely on in FF.

Its also got a bad habit of corrupting itself. :?

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Fri May 22, 2009 1:35 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
It is faster with JavaScript sites, performance loading "normal" pages isn't that much better.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Fri May 22, 2009 1:36 pm
Profile ICQ
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 417
Reply with quote
I use Chrome and love it. I did a little review of Chrome 2 in the internet forum if you're interested in my opinions/findings.

_________________
paulzolo wrote:
gavomatic57 wrote:
I wonder if the brick will overheat before apple release a firmware update for it??


Depends if it’s an air brick or not, I suppose.


Fri May 22, 2009 3:24 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
I find it extremely useful for when I need a browser quickly (to quickly search for something etc, since it launches in seconds). However, if I'm going for a full web session then I launch Firefox without fail.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Fri May 22, 2009 4:24 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:16 pm
Posts: 704
Location: Leeds, UK
Reply with quote
I've used it religiously since it came out and think it's the bees knees.

Haven't even bothered installing firefox since formatting.

Opera's still good for image-heavy sessions. You know like searching for images to edit, browsing photos online, porn... that sorta stuff. Chrome's windowing is a little bit too firefoxy.


Sat May 23, 2009 2:38 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 417
Reply with quote
Angelic wrote:
I've used it religiously since it came out and think it's the bees knees.

Haven't even bothered installing firefox since formatting.

Opera's still good for image-heavy sessions. You know like searching for images to edit, browsing photos online, porn... that sorta stuff. Chrome's windowing is a little bit too firefoxy.


Have you got Chrome 2 yet?

_________________
paulzolo wrote:
gavomatic57 wrote:
I wonder if the brick will overheat before apple release a firmware update for it??


Depends if it’s an air brick or not, I suppose.


Sat May 23, 2009 5:06 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:16 pm
Posts: 704
Location: Leeds, UK
Reply with quote
Danstevens wrote:
Angelic wrote:
I've used it religiously since it came out and think it's the bees knees.

Haven't even bothered installing firefox since formatting.

Opera's still good for image-heavy sessions. You know like searching for images to edit, browsing photos online, porn... that sorta stuff. Chrome's windowing is a little bit too firefoxy.


Have you got Chrome 2 yet?


Nope..

And from what i've read of chrome 2 there doesn't seem to be much difference =/

Will probably wait for official release.


Sun May 24, 2009 6:49 am
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I'm gonna try it anyway, but anyone know of any downsides to Chrome with a netbook and mobile broadband? I kind of like things like Adblock etc, but Chrome would be ideal for the quick loading or whatever :?

Resurrecting old threads FTW! :D ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:57 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
As I said above, it doesn't load sites any quicker (or noticeably quicker), we are talking, at most, 10ths of a second difference between Chrome and Firefox or Internet Explorer...

What is quicker is the JavaScript execution - although Safari is quicker still and Firefox 3.5 has closed the gap considerably.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:15 am
Profile ICQ
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
As I said above, it doesn't load sites any quicker (or noticeably quicker), we are talking, at most, 10ths of a second difference between Chrome and Firefox or Internet Explorer...

What is quicker is the JavaScript execution - although Safari is quicker still and Firefox 3.5 has closed the gap considerably.


Yip, but that all adds up to a lifetime on a 10'' netbook with mobile b'band ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:39 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1036
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
Reply with quote
I actually find that IE8 is the faster browser on my PC!

I've tried FF3.5, Chrome 2 and Opera. But I don't use IE8 on principle that its got more security holes than a collinder, and that you can't get stuff like ABP for it.

_________________
Paulzolo, on about Micheal Jackson wrote:
All he ever “lifted” were his cock and balls. On stage and in front of children.

Image
Kimmotalk is where all the cool people hang.


Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:39 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
big_D wrote:
As I said above, it doesn't load sites any quicker (or noticeably quicker), we are talking, at most, 10ths of a second difference between Chrome and Firefox or Internet Explorer...

What is quicker is the JavaScript execution - although Safari is quicker still and Firefox 3.5 has closed the gap considerably.


Yip, but that all adds up to a lifetime on a 10'' netbook with mobile b'band ;)

If you are using a lot of Web Apps (Google Docs and the like), then it will save you a bit of time.

You would need to visit several thousand "normal" sites in a sitting for it to make any significant difference.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:03 pm
Profile ICQ
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
^ Whatever helps :)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:32 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
I just downloaded it.

My first impressions are mixed. The install process is good. It's nice and clean and minimalist too which is good.

But, and for me it's a big but...

The actual application seems to be quite slow. Typing is not as quick, selecting things takes longer. Boxes appear slowly, and fades are jittery. :?

_________________
Image


Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:24 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.