Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Apple becomes the most valuable company in history 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/a ... ion-364125

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:22 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
What I'm immediately thinking is 'does China have a stock market'?

Jon


Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:43 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Comparing Apple to Facebook, not really a very good comparison, in my opinion.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:42 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
Erm.... not quite. :roll:

$621 billion in 2000 is roughly equivalent to $825 billion today, adjusted for inflation.

_________________
Jim

Image


Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:10 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
History is a pretty big thing, and that comparison between MS and Apple seems a little narrow. Wall Street market cap with inflation uncompensated is all very well, but some companies have existed with assets that massively exceed Apple's shareholder value (which incorporates all assets and anticipated future revenues).

Apple gets nowhere near the value of the East India Company, or the Dutch East India Company, the South Sea Company.... Those would all be well over a trillion in modern dollars. The same may well apply to the Medici banking empire and Crassus' fire brigade. Plus there are state owned oil companies that (depending on how big their reserves actually are) are vastly more valuable than Exxon right now, making them likely to be more so than Apple too.

On the plus side though, Apple has done less morally dubious stuff than any of those historical guys, who were much worse than them in key areas such as slavery, opium running, assassination, invading countries and so on. So really this is a big win for corporate social responsibility. Hurrah for Apple and its very half-hearted commitment to slavery.


Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:59 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
Hurrah for Apple and its very half-hearted commitment to slavery.

:?:
Justification please?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:09 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
So it's not what the company is actually worth but what the stock market thinks it's worth. It's like a house - it's "worth" £x according to an estate agent but everyone knows it's really worth less.

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:02 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
dogbert10 wrote:
So it's not what the company is actually worth but what the stock market thinks it's worth. It's like a house - it's "worth" £x according to an estate agent but everyone knows it's really worth less.

Very true but at least in this case the comparison with MS is like with like - they're comparing the stock market's valuation of MS then to the same of Apple now. Both are equally valid (or not valid, depending on your opinion).


Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:48 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
dogbert10 wrote:
So it's not what the company is actually worth but what the stock market thinks it's worth. It's like a house - it's "worth" £x according to an estate agent but everyone knows it's really worth less.

You could say that, but if you stop and think about it you will notice that the same can be said of all things of any value, whatever method is used to establish it. Including gold, diamonds, Dollars, Bollinger, an hour with a dentist (or a hooker), or anything else except a mother's love. So treasure your dear old ma as she's the only thing in your life the value of which is not determined by the liquidity of markets and the confidence of investors.


Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:52 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.