Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Canon Japan : "ISO can go beyond 102,400" 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
It is technically possible to push equivalent ISO sensitivity beyond '102,400' in a future DSLR camera, say Canon Japan's research and development chiefs.
Well, good.
These higher ISOs are likely to mean better noise reduction controls in-camera, which can only be a good thing, right?
Clicky

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:35 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Until I can take a photo of a black cat in a coal mine, in no light, I won't be happy. DSLRs are rubbish. ;)

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:50 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
DSLRs are rubbish. ;)
You'll change your tune sooner or later.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:27 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
ProfessorF wrote:
DSLRs are rubbish. ;)
You'll change your tune sooner or later.

Mark


Yes he will, as will I. I still believe that the technology will have to get a lot better beofre I even consider ditching my F65 though.

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:05 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 175
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Until I can take a photo of a black cat in a coal mine, in no light, I won't be happy. DSLRs are rubbish. ;)

What do you use currently for those cat shots? And, even more challenging, how do you persuade the cat to model for you in all that filthy coal slurry? ;)


Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:57 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
I still believe that the technology will have to get a lot better beofre I even consider ditching my F65 though.
You don't have to ditch celluloid to get a digital.
Each has it's place.
For what it's worth, I don't think the tech. will have to get "a lot better". A little better and a lot cheaper would do it. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:58 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
Mrs. V. has a Kodak 12MP something or other which I bought her last year, and the photos are quite impressive, but I still prefer using my F65.

Actually I prefer using my Praktica ML5 which is completely manual and probably made before I was... ;)

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:08 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1899
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
Mrs. V. has a Kodak 12MP something or other which I bought her last year, and the photos are quite impressive, but I still prefer using my F65.

Actually I prefer using my Praktica ML5 which is completely manual and probably made before I was... ;)


Is it something like this:
Image

_________________
Image

My Flickr Page

Now with added ball and chain.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:21 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Laugh @ James.
(8+D

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:23 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Laugh @ James.
(8+D

Mark


Yes, very good james :D

It's actually this one.

Image

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:52 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
Laugh @ James.
(8+D

Mark


Yes, very good james :D

It's actually this one.

Image


:o

What does it want? :shock:

;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:10 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
nvj1662 wrote:
What do you use currently for those cat shots? And, even more challenging, how do you persuade the cat to model for you in all that filthy coal slurry? ;)



A pencil and some paper. ;)

Was just joshing about the DSLRs thing. As Mark says, each has their place. I will, at some point, buy into the whole digital-schmigital thing, but only when I can afford to replace the lenses I currently own with their digital equivalents. So that'll be a 28mm, 45mm, 50mm and a 135mm in whatever flavour system I buy into.

For now though, and for the most part, I'm happy using film for some things, and the work DSLR for their stuff.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:54 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
Laugh @ James.
(8+D

Mark


Yes, very good james :D

It's actually this one.

Image

My brother had one of those, lucky git. I had the MTL3 (still have it sitting in the corner). I took much better pictures with that than I ever did with my newer Canon EOS500...

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:24 am
Profile ICQ
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
I took much better pictures with that than I ever did with my newer Canon EOS500...


That's a matter of perspective. I think I take much better pictures with my DSLR than I ever did with the Olympus OM10.

The thing is digital is different to film. There are some things you have to bear in mind when using a DSLR which probably never arise with even the most sophisticated 35mm film camera. There's a lot of electronics going on which try to make the best of the image, and the exposure system is trying to optimise everything. Once you know that, you can adjust and override and get the pictures you want. It just takes practice, and a better understanding of what the camera's trying to do.

I recommend books on the subject as a primer. Check the Photography forum for a list of publications recommended, and also check out the numerous blogs and podcasts on digital photography.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:01 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.