Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
External HDD Enclosure 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Marbella Spain
Reply with quote
It's just a thought but what about online back ups saves the hardware problem ,might even be cheaper if your adsl is any good.
like I said just a thought ,or even a website with space ,hmmm must check that myself running out of space here too. ;) ;)

_________________
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming...
Damn, What a ride!!


Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:04 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
lacloss wrote:
It's just a thought but what about online back ups saves the hardware problem ,might even be cheaper if your adsl is any good.
like I said just a thought ,or even a website with space ,hmmm must check that myself running out of space here too. ;) ;)
My RAW images folder is currently 98GB by itself. I'm not sure online backup is in a place to suite my needs.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:14 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:18 pm
Posts: 289
Reply with quote
Mark, before you buy, have a read of this thread. Probably worth checking that it ships with uk power supply and the eject lever issue has been fixed (i believe there are 2 versions).

Didge

_________________
eurotech


Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:17 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
lacloss wrote:
It's just a thought but what about online back ups saves the hardware problem ,might even be cheaper if your adsl is any good.
like I said just a thought ,or even a website with space ,hmmm must check that myself running out of space here too. ;) ;)
My RAW images folder is currently 98GB by itself. I'm not sure online backup is in a place to suite my needs.

Mark

Uploading the full amount would take a long while, but how quickly is that growing? If it's less than a gig a week then on-line would still be viable.

However, the cheapest way would be to buy your own storage device and put it on a friends computer. Perhaps you could make a reciprocal agreement and swap drives to get over the initial upload problem. The obvious advantage is that it insures your data against fire and theft. It takes some knowledge to set up, but it's not really that difficult if you know someone with the know how - and I'm pretty sure you do.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:30 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
I think it needs two drives to work.
The controller in the enclosure then spans the drives to give you one big volume. I'm not sure this can be overridden.
Mark

If it's doing any sort of RAID it probably won't work with only one drive in it. If you want to be able to add drives gradually you're probably looking more at something like a Drobo. They're not cheap though and even they need two drives to start off with.

Jon


Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:46 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Just an update to let you know that I don't have any problems with the Voyager Q.
I've used it with both 2.5" and 3.5" drives and neither one of them has, as yet, exhibited any sort of problem. The problem that some people appear to have had regarding the eject mechanism doesn't appear to hamper the usability of it.
Thanks every one for contributing to the thread.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:24 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.