View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Sun May 18, 2025 3:13 am
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
State pension age should be 70, say bosses
Author |
Message |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/money/pens ... 05408.htmlMore bad news for the youngsters. Add that to the higher taxes because of PFI and PPP used by the Tories and New Labour.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:33 pm |
|
 |
bobbdobbs
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm Posts: 5490 Location: just behind you!
|
Dont worry the bosses and MP's will be ok 
_________________Finally joined Flickr
|
Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:37 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
I personally think that companies should be banned from having separate directors pension funds. That way if the staff pension fund is short then the directors suffer as well.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:59 pm |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
LOL I like that idea. 
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:28 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
Yes it will avoid the situation like Phoenix which went bust and the directors pension fund was full and the Rover staff pension fund was empty. An additional could be that directors cannot claim against the pension fund for one year after leaving. So if the company goes bust they get no money for a year and if the pension fund is under funded they suffer more than most. They had control over placing funds into the pension fund. That would be fairer.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:12 pm |
|
 |
davrosG5
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am Posts: 6954 Location: Peebo
|
The problem is of course that directors and executives tend to have a contribution paid by the company into an external pension fund while the employees have no choice as to where their pension is invested.
I certainly like the idea of the directors/executives being stuck with the same pension provisions they inflict ont he rest of the staff though.
_________________ When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum. -Billy Connolly (to a heckler)
|
Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
It will have the same impact where they stop final salary schemes for staff but have a final salary scheme for directors. That could not happen under my scheme.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:27 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|