Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
State pension age should be 70, say bosses 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
http://www.independent.co.uk/money/pens ... 05408.html

More bad news for the youngsters. Add that to the higher taxes because of PFI and PPP used by the Tories and New Labour.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:33 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
Dont worry the bosses and MP's will be ok :x

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
Dont worry the bosses and MP's will be ok :x

I personally think that companies should be banned from having separate directors pension funds. That way if the staff pension fund is short then the directors suffer as well.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:59 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
I personally think that companies should be banned from having separate directors pension funds. That way if the staff pension fund is short then the directors suffer as well.


LOL I like that idea. :D

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:28 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
I personally think that companies should be banned from having separate directors pension funds. That way if the staff pension fund is short then the directors suffer as well.


LOL I like that idea. :D

Yes it will avoid the situation like Phoenix which went bust and the directors pension fund was full and the Rover staff pension fund was empty. An additional could be that directors cannot claim against the pension fund for one year after leaving. So if the company goes bust they get no money for a year and if the pension fund is under funded they suffer more than most. They had control over placing funds into the pension fund. That would be fairer.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:12 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
The problem is of course that directors and executives tend to have a contribution paid by the company into an external pension fund while the employees have no choice as to where their pension is invested.

I certainly like the idea of the directors/executives being stuck with the same pension provisions they inflict ont he rest of the staff though.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:14 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
The problem is of course that directors and executives tend to have a contribution paid by the company into an external pension fund while the employees have no choice as to where their pension is invested.

I certainly like the idea of the directors/executives being stuck with the same pension provisions they inflict ont he rest of the staff though.

It will have the same impact where they stop final salary schemes for staff but have a final salary scheme for directors. That could not happen under my scheme.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:27 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.