Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Huge fine in US file-sharing case 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Quote:
A woman has been ordered to pay $1.9 million (£1.2m) in the only file-sharing case to go to trial in the US.
A jury in Minnesota ruled Jammie Thomas-Rasset, 32, had violated music copyright and must pay damages to the record industry.


cheap CD's have always been the way i get any music i want
i cant be bothered with downloading …

http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/techn ... 108589.stm

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:10 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
That's an expensive four songs! I can't believe how disproportionate the fine is.

_________________
Image


Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:23 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 3:39 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Peterborough
Reply with quote
£1.2m you get less for speeding, and that puts peoples lives at risk!!!!

All they have done is ruined this woman's life. I'm not saying she should get away with it but she will not learn from this as she will most likely never be able to pay the fine back.

All I get from this is that my dislike for the record labels still stands.

_________________
Image


Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:30 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
I'd be surprised if they actually collected the money. The bad publicity would ruin them. Mind you, they don't really seem to care about that, do they! :?

_________________
Image


Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:33 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 3:39 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Peterborough
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
The bad publicity would ruin them.


It seems the bad PR has already taken effect somewhat.

Nick wrote:
Mind you, they don't really seem to care about that, do they! :?


Agreed

_________________
Image


Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:43 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Hahahahaha, shouldn't've gone to a retrial.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:22 pm
Profile WWW
Has a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Kingdom of Fife
Reply with quote
It just guarantees that my purchases of CD's will be as small as they have been for several years because of this sort of nonsense i.e. less than 1 a year and all were bargain basement at the supermarket purchases. I like music and used to buy a reasonable number each year but there are plenty of other things vying for what little disposable income I have so I can easily do without. Same goes for films. Besides CD's are far from the only way to hear music.

One day they'll die or wake up and start doing something positive for their business but I'm not holding my breathe waiting.

Richard.


Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:52 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Now that's what I call a pyrrhic victory - they get their conviction but they'll never see a cent.

Love it.

_________________
Jim

Image


Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:16 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
If the family had $millions they'd have been daft to Kazza.

I wonder how much the trial cost. I'm pretty sure the lawyers got fat off this bollocks.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:08 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
Complete f*cking waste of time. The fine should be proportionate to either the damage (the cost of the songs downloaded as bought say from itunes) or the person's income (say 1% of their salary for ten years).

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:01 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 10:01 am
Posts: 433
Location: Harrogate
Reply with quote
Thomas-Rasset said she has no means of paying the fine: "There's no way they're ever going to get that.

"I'm a mom, limited means, so I'm not going to worry about it now."

right on.

_________________
Image

get an iphone not a life.


Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:43 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.