This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3040 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 203  Next
The Random Sh*t Thread Pt 2 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
themcman1 wrote:
soddit112 wrote:
PS the original quote from wikipedia had arrows in the text (replaced by text in square brackets), but i got an SQL error :?


Yehah, the db doesn't like quite a few unicode characters iirc.


Oooooh, DB formatting errors, must put in some non latin characters ;)

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:43 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
I don't know what's worse, fireworks that sound like The Troubles are back on again, or ones that sound like a bunch of birds squawking all at once, failing to even make a bang at the end of it all :x

I'm starting to think the things should be banned completely. Or at least given to the troops as a psychological weapon against Johnny Taliban :lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:43 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Went to look at TVs yesterday. Ended up with a Panasonic TX-L32GW10W 32" Full HD model, with built in satellite receiver. The test HD freeview channels are amazing, shame they only do a couple of hours of programming again, but they are supposed to be switching them on full time next year.

The TV itself uses 91W max, with the satellite using about another 50W. Given most of the Toshiba, LG, Samsung and Sony models were in the 140-160W range, without the satellite receiver, that sounds reasonable (Grunding were the only other one offering sub 100W TVs, plus a more expensive Toshiba, which used around 130W, but had similar power saving facilities to the Panasonic, which drops consumption to around 70W if the lighting in the room is just right...

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:35 am
Profile ICQ
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
big_D wrote:
Went to look at TVs yesterday. Ended up with a Panasonic TX-L32GW10W 32" Full HD model, with built in satellite receiver. The test HD freeview channels are amazing, shame they only do a couple of hours of programming again, but they are supposed to be switching them on full time next year.

The TV itself uses 91W max, with the satellite using about another 50W. Given most of the Toshiba, LG, Samsung and Sony models were in the 140-160W range, without the satellite receiver, that sounds reasonable (Grunding were the only other one offering sub 100W TVs, plus a more expensive Toshiba, which used around 130W, but had similar power saving facilities to the Panasonic, which drops consumption to around 70W if the lighting in the room is just right...


If you don't mind me asking big_D, what was the price? Don't think I've ever saw one with a built in satellite receiver over here!

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:44 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
big_D wrote:
The TV itself uses 91W max, with the satellite using about another 50W. Given most of the Toshiba, LG, Samsung and Sony models were in the 140-160W range, without the satellite receiver, that sounds reasonable (Grunding were the only other one offering sub 100W TVs, plus a more expensive Toshiba, which used around 130W, but had similar power saving facilities to the Panasonic, which drops consumption to around 70W if the lighting in the room is just right...


Are they dvb-s or dvb-s2? dvb-s2 is the future standard that will be switched to soon :)

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:28 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Opened a Paypal dispute, so that should see me getting frustrated more than usual through the week :roll:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:44 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
It is DVB-T and DVB-S2.

It has 4 HDMI, 2 SCART, Component and S-Video, plus SD card slot and VGA

Pcernie, I paid 899€, although the RRP is around a grand and I've seen it online for about a hundred less, but I prefer to have a local service point.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:00 pm
Profile ICQ
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
big_D wrote:
It is DVB-T and DVB-S2.

It has 4 HDMI, 2 SCART, Component and S-Video, plus SD card slot and VGA

Pcernie, I paid 899€, although the RRP is around a grand and I've seen it online for about a hundred less, but I prefer to have a local service point.


Nice one big_D :D

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:25 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1036
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
Finally got my Hackintosh to work! :)

I'm running OSX 10.5.9 on here, and I must say it's so much faster than Windows 7. Quartz Extreme is pretty cool, too. :D

_________________
Paulzolo, on about Micheal Jackson wrote:
All he ever “lifted” were his cock and balls. On stage and in front of children.

Image
Kimmotalk is where all the cool people hang.


Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:18 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
bally199 wrote:
I'm running OSX 10.5.9 on here, and I must say it's so much faster than Windows 7. Quartz Extreme is pretty cool, too. :D


Yup, apparently - http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-31012_7-10 ... 55804.html

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:15 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
ProfessorF wrote:
bally199 wrote:
I'm running OSX 10.5.9 on here, and I must say it's so much faster than Windows 7. Quartz Extreme is pretty cool, too. :D


Yup, apparently - http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-31012_7-10 ... 55804.html


The COD and Cinegraph charts say otherwise :|

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:23 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Well, if playing games is your main concern, fine, but for most folk I'd say battery performance and the stuff in the first chart would matter more. Horses for courses. Be interesting to see the scores were OS X available on non-Apple hardware as well. :)

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:26 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1036
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
ProfessorF wrote:
Well, if playing games is your main concern, fine, but for most folk I'd say battery performance and the stuff in the first chart would matter more. Horses for courses. Be interesting to see the scores were OS X available on non-Apple hardware as well. :)


If you point me towards some benchmarking software, I'll run it on here (3.4ghz Pentium D, 4gb RAM and a 9600GT), then have you got an Intel Mac? Run it on there and see what happens.

I have Halo on here now. It's running with everything maxxed out, and it looks so much better than it did on the PC. Even better than it did on the Xbox! :D

_________________
Paulzolo, on about Micheal Jackson wrote:
All he ever “lifted” were his cock and balls. On stage and in front of children.

Image
Kimmotalk is where all the cool people hang.


Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:30 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
ProfessorF wrote:
Well, if playing games is your main concern, fine, but for most folk I'd say battery performance and the stuff in the first chart would matter more. Horses for courses. Be interesting to see the scores were OS X available on non-Apple hardware as well. :)

For me, game playing is like the start-up/shutdown times, they are pretty irrelevant to the general use of a computer. You switch it on once a day, generally... :?

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:29 am
Profile ICQ
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1036
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
So now I've ironed out all the little problems I had with the Hackintosh, and now it's working perfectly. I have full 3d acceleration, all my sound system works (including the surround sound ports on my motherboard!), I have Wifi and LAN, and finally all the OSX apps work. In fact, I'm getting to grips with iChat and that iLife thing now.

Only thing I don't like is the Apple keyboard. I'm using my G4's keyboard on this (One of those white ones with the clear perspex back thing) and the @ key is in the wrong place. But this is a UK keyboard. Is this the same for every Mac keyboard, where @ is on the number 2? And " is where the @ sign should be? :D

But it's really really snappy, and I'm happy with it! Who's up for some Hackintosh vs Mac vs Windows benchmarking? :P

_________________
Paulzolo, on about Micheal Jackson wrote:
All he ever “lifted” were his cock and balls. On stage and in front of children.

Image
Kimmotalk is where all the cool people hang.


Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:15 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 3040 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 203  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.