Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Auditors face inquiry call after Lehman revelations 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Quote:
Pressure was mounting this weekend for a root-and-branch review of the role played by auditors in the credit crunch, following the revelation that Lehman Brothers was able to hide $50bn (£32bn) of debts from regulators despite checks by accountancy firm Ernst & Young.

MPs and financial experts called on regulators to clean up the audit industry as part of a clampdown on reckless and risky practices in the financial sector.

...

Ernst & Young, which earned fees of $31m from auditing Lehman Brothers in 2007, has insisted that a thorough internal review showed it did nothing wrong.


certain banks where labelled, targeted and setup for the release of the boil called 'sub' prime debt (toxic debt)
and the organisations that overseer that are paid by the self same masters that they themselves overseer

but please remember it was the tax payer who 'bailed out' the private banking system ... ho hum ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Sun Mar 14, 2010 8:51 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
The auditors have long been as dodgy as any of the people they looked into :evil:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:28 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
The auditors have long been as dodgy as any of the people they looked into :evil:

Not always. Auditing is barely profitable for accountancy firms. They usually have to bid for big audits and then make up the profits on the consultancy work. I personally think that this can be a huge conflict of interest. If they provide the consultancy work they will have a tendency to overlook their involvement in such deals.

Longer term though maybe a criminal action against Ernst & Young that effectively kills them off like Arthur Anderson after Enron. It will mean fewer big auditors but that might mean that the auditors become more cautious. To lose two big auditors in a little more than a decade might make them re think their client relationships.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:35 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
pcernie wrote:
The auditors have long been as dodgy as any of the people they looked into :evil:

Not always. Auditing is barely profitable for accountancy firms. They usually have to bid for big audits and then make up the profits on the consultancy work. I personally think that this can be a huge conflict of interest. If they provide the consultancy work they will have a tendency to overlook their involvement in such deals.

Longer term though maybe a criminal action against Ernst & Young that effectively kills them off like Arthur Anderson after Enron. It will mean fewer big auditors but that might mean that the auditors become more cautious. To lose two big auditors in a little more than a decade might make them re think their client relationships.


+1, I meant the last decade or so.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I have been on both sides as an auditor and as the person having their work audited. Even now the majority of auditors are good and competent. The bigger auditors have different problems. They have a lot of graduates so even trainees start on £25k+ that is hard work to break even on a large job without skipping a few corners. Also the real problems do not lie in the audit. Lehman's would have done many things at a high level so well above the pay grade of the average auditor. It is these which are the problem.

With many of the banks the problems are with the valuation of the mortgages. If it is being paid properly it could be valued at the full value but many loans are not being paid regularly these could be worthless if they are second mortgages, but under the US stress tests they are values at nearly full value. That discrepancy is going to be big problem. How they are valued is down to the partners and senior auditors in negotiations with directors.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:40 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 5 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.