Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Wireless Security 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Hey folks, one of my neighbours got visited recently by the Police 'cos their connection had been used to do some highly illegal stuff. :shock:

So I decided to beef up our wireless security. Here's what I did:

  • Changed encryption from WPA to WPA2[PSK]
  • Set up an access control list of specific MAC addresses
  • Disabled SSID broadcast
  • Set new decent & different passwords for the wireless access key and the administrator interface.

The problem is that my iPod Touch refuses to reconnect to the network if it locks the screen and the network is not broadcasting an SSID - I have to set up the connection manually again. Is there a way to fix this or am I going to have to re-enable SSID broadcast?

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:24 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Hiding the SSID doesn't increase security, so it doesn't matter if you have to re-enable it. There is no advantage to having it hidden.

One other thing you could do for better security is reduce the transmit power as far as you can without disturbing your network.

_________________
Image


Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:03 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
Hiding the SSID doesn't increase security, so it doesn't matter if you have to re-enable it. There is no advantage to having it hidden.

One other thing you could do for better security is reduce the transmit power as far as you can without disturbing your network.


I couldn't see an option to do that, but I'll have another look, thanks :).

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:46 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
Hiding the SSID doesn't increase security

It actually reduces security by increasing the chatter with active clients thus making the WPA2 encryption easier to crack.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:02 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Nick wrote:
Hiding the SSID doesn't increase security

It actually reduces security by increasing the chatter with active clients thus making the WPA2 encryption easier to crack.


Fair enough, I'll just re-enable SSID broadcast then. :mrgreen:

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:37 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 175
Reply with quote
Because you mention neighbours, I assume you are speaking of a domestic network? If so, then consider switching the wireless off when not in use and keeping a log. The MAC address is broadcast in ARP traffic so it is possible to sniff both the SSID and the MAC address from a legitimate session.


Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:10 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Ooh, ooh, ooh!! Was just gonna start a new thread on a related topic. Mind if I jack?

Just setting up a Linksys AP at work which will be for the exclusive use of my guests. It's on a separate ADSL line and is not connected to any of my hardware. Do I need anything better than WEP? We wouldn't get many passing leaches as we're in the middle of nowhere, but obviously I want some security and I may yet charge a small amount to my captive audience.

In the setup it talks about WPA2 etc. but I'm used to a proper network with wires, so I don't have a clue about this wireless nonsense. It's offering me WEP (64 or 128bit), WPA Personal, WPA2 Personal, WPA Mixed. I've had a look around Wiki, but still haven't figured about the difference. Any ideas.....?


Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:39 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 175
Reply with quote
WEP is almost useless against anyone but casual passers-by as tools are readily available that will crack it in minutes (sometimes less). You will cause yourself the trouble of configuring it and the hassle of ensuring that your users have it configured, ruling it out of any troubleshooting etc, etc. If you do not consider your installation to be a target, don't bother. If you're concerned, use WPA2.

I don't know what linksys model you have but have a butch here: http://www.linksysbycisco.com/?search_keyword=WPA+Mixed&x=0&y=0&pagename=LBC%2FCommon%2FDynamicWrapper&site=UK&ppath=search&c=Page&lang=en


Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:50 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
There is only one level of security that should be used, WPA2. WEP is harder to configure and is less secure. It should only ever be used if you have a legacy device which can't be upgraded and you cannot live without it being in your network - although you might as well save yourself the hassle and run an unencrypted network in that case.

WEP can be cracked in a couple of minutes, WPA in a couple of hours. WPA2 is currently unhacked and only susceptible to a dictionary attack - you should always use a key of at least 21 characters.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:39 am
Profile ICQ
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
WEP can be cracked in a couple of minutes, WPA in a couple of hours. WPA2 is currently unhacked and only susceptible to a dictionary attack - you should always use a key of at least 21 characters.

I have heard WEP can be cracked in under 30 seconds. Though as you have said it will be enough to keep out the casual attempt. I would recommend a randomly generated password, so that dictionary attacks are impossible and brute force attacks much harder.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:43 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5150
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
Hey folks, one of my neighbours got visited recently by the Police 'cos their connection had been used to do some highly illegal stuff. :shock:

So I decided to beef up our wireless security. Here's what I did:

  • Changed encryption from WPA to WPA2[PSK]
  • Set up an access control list of specific MAC addresses
  • Disabled SSID broadcast
  • Set new decent & different passwords for the wireless access key and the administrator interface.

The problem is that my iPod Touch refuses to reconnect to the network if it locks the screen and the network is not broadcasting an SSID - I have to set up the connection manually again. Is there a way to fix this or am I going to have to re-enable SSID broadcast?


I've had a setup identical to yours (less the MAC address filtering) and my iPod Touch worked fine...


Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:47 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
My router won't connect any wireless client until you hold down a button on the back of the router.

It can be a PITA sometimes but I wouldn't want to be without it.

_________________
Jim

Image


Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:23 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Do you mean connect for the first time, or connect full stop?

If you mean every time then I really couldn't be doing with it, but if it's only for the initial connection then that sounds like a really good feature.

_________________
Image


Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:42 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.