Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Gypsies have more rights 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/greenp ... state.html


Reasons not to vote Labour, 1,2,3.......

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Wed May 05, 2010 6:44 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I don't really see what this has to do with Labour or whichever party is in government, the gypsies will always do their own thing with disregard to the law and neighbours.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed May 05, 2010 7:30 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
dogbert10 wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/greenpolitics/planning/7680658/Gipsies-human-rights-more-important-than-residents-fears-new-planning-rules-state.html


Reasons not to vote Labour, 1,2,3.......


The Torygraph quoting the Daily Fail. :?

There was some hooha around Blackmore about gypsies setting up a massive site. Blown out of all proportions because in reality there is already a site, and the intention was to add a couple more pitches to it. Local media rather enjoyed bigging the problem up to apocalyptic proportions.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed May 05, 2010 7:33 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
I don't really see what this has to do with Labour or whichever party is in government, the gypsies will always do their own thing with disregard to the law and neighbours.


The law allowing gypsies to ride roughshod over planning laws came from the Department for Communities and Local Government - Labour, in other words. Why should they be treated differently.

Oh, and the paper it's published in makes no difference - unless you believe that they print what the parties tell them to.

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Wed May 05, 2010 11:05 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
dogbert10 wrote:
Oh, and the paper it's published in makes no difference - unless you believe that they print what the parties tell them to.

It's more that the papers print whatever supports the agenda it is they wish to advance and things like 'truth' and 'details' are a secondary consideration to that.


Wed May 05, 2010 1:24 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
dogbert10 wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/greenpolitics/planning/7680658/Gipsies-human-rights-more-important-than-residents-fears-new-planning-rules-state.html


Reasons not to vote Labour, 1,2,3.......

Human rights legislation always takes precedence over any other form of domestic law, it cannot be any other way unless you are willing to do away with human rights altogether.

As for what part of which human rights law is actually involved, well unfortunately the journalist involved was too lazy to tell us. So at present we lack sufficient information to sensibly judge the matter and must all resort to knee jerk reaction.


Wed May 05, 2010 7:41 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
Human rights legislation always takes precedence over any other form of domestic law, it cannot be any other way unless you are willing to do away with human rights altogether.

As for what part of which human rights law is actually involved, well unfortunately the journalist involved was too lazy to tell us. So at present we lack sufficient information to sensibly judge the matter and must all resort to knee jerk reaction.

Not only that but the author manages, rather unhelpfully, to conflate Gypsies and Travellers. The two really aren't the same.

_________________
Jim

Image


Wed May 05, 2010 8:06 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.