Author |
Message |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|

 |  |  |  | Quote: People accused of rape in England and Wales are to be granted anonymity under proposals announced by the coalition government.
The proposal was not in the Liberal Democrat or Conservative manifesto, but has been a Lib-Dem policy.
But the plan angered anti-rape campaigners who said it would do nothing to improve the conviction rate.
At present, there are no restrictions on naming defendants who are over 18 years old.
The government's proposal for anonymity would only affect England and Wales. There is no anonymity for rape defendants in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
The document setting out the programme for government says that ministers will extend anonymity in rape cases to defendants, but does not elaborate how this would work in practice.
The Ministry of Justice would not be drawn on how the proposal would be applied, other than to say: "This is a sensitive area and careful analysis of the options and implications will be undertaken."
'Insult'
But Ruth Hall, of Women Against Rape, said the government's decision to grant anonymity to suspects was an "insult".
"More attention needs to be paid to the 94% of reported cases that do not end in conviction rather than the few that are false," she said.
A LASTING EFFECT? You've still got your name connected to it. Just to have it connected to something like that is bad, terrible, nightmarish. It doesn't matter what the outcome was.
New life for man cleared of rape
"If men accused of rape got special rights to anonymity, it would reinforce the misconception that lots of women who report rape are lying."
Official statistics show that while only 6% of all reports of rape to the police lead to a conviction, more than half of the cases that make it to trial result in the suspect being found guilty.
Despite not appearing in the Liberal Democrat manifesto, the anonymity proposal became party policy at its 2006 conference after a number of cases in which celebrities were named in newspapers in allegations of sexual assault.
The policy resolution stated that defendants should remain anonymous in rape cases unless and until they are convicted.
Supporters of the measure said that it removed the taint of "no smoke without fire" that cleared defendants say they suffer.
But the proposal divided the party with some activitists saying it could lower conviction rates, as it could mean fewer witnesses or other victims coming forward.
Some legal experts have argued that anonymity could only be justified if society concluded that the crime was far worse than every other offence, including murder, and that there was proof of a high rate of false allegations.
But a major independent review of rape earlier this year warned there needed to be a proper examination of the wider issues.
The 1976 Labour government introduced anonymity for defendants - only for the measure to be repealed 12 years later under the Conservatives.
During this time, judges could refuse to grant anonymity where naming the defendant would make it more likely for other victims to come forward.
In 2001, the then director of public prosecutions said there was a case for reintroducing limited anonymity.
During this period, there has been a series of stories in national newspapers where celebrities suspected of rape were named, even though in some cases they were not charged or the complainant was malicious. |  |  |  |  |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8695367.stmIt's one hell of an issue, but my initial reaction is to grant anonymity, as I could see it being more positive than negative overall. How the press handle it would be another issue altogether. Christ, even social networking... Is it possible to introduce something like this with the promise of a review later by a committee of MPs and/or interested parties, for instance?
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Thu May 20, 2010 9:59 pm |
|
 |
rustybucket
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm Posts: 5836
|
_________________Jim
|
Thu May 20, 2010 11:38 pm |
|
 |
CMOT-Weasel
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:43 am Posts: 270 Location: Deepest darkest Wales
|
Until proven guilty, of course they have the right to anonymity. Why the hell shouldn't they?
|
Fri May 21, 2010 12:14 am |
|
 |
finlay666
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 4876 Location: Newcastle
|
Everyone should until guilty
_________________TwitterCharlie Brooker: Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.
|
Fri May 21, 2010 12:32 am |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|
I think the main point is:
"Some legal experts have argued that anonymity could only be justified if society concluded that the crime was far worse than every other offence, including murder, and that there was proof of a high rate of false allegations."
I think society has indeed concluded that sexual crimes are worse than murder. Certainly, they are far more tabloid worthy and far more likely to incite brainless vigilante style injustice. If society wasn't so prone to drawing prejudicial conclusions then it wouldn't be a problem, but unfortunately most people are shallow minded barbarians. You only need the slightest rumour that someone is a kiddy-fiddler and every forum is full of posts demanding immediate death by torture without trial.
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
|
Fri May 21, 2010 12:36 am |
|
 |
jonlumb
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm Posts: 4141 Location: Exeter
|
Given the vigilante action that has been seen over suspected paedophiles even after acquital shows that there are certain folk who don't take the results of the legal system seriously. Given that at least one Paediatrician was attacked in south Wales clearly shows how bloody stupid these people are.
The corollary problem is that it's actually not that hard for a woman to cry 'rape' simply to get at someone or because they got very drunk and then regretted it. For the men at the receiving end, it makes their life a misery even after cases have been thrown out (ie not even got as far as a jury decision the prosecution was so poor).
_________________ "The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."
|
Fri May 21, 2010 6:33 am |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
+1 Allegations like that stick for life even if they are false. It's a shame some women make things up like that, but it does happen. No matter what the verdict, the man's life is ruined. The only thing I will say is they need more victim support for women who have suffered this.
|
Fri May 21, 2010 7:00 am |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
|
Fri May 21, 2010 8:09 am |
|
 |
james016
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm Posts: 1899
|
_________________ My Flickr PageNow with added ball and chain.
|
Fri May 21, 2010 8:14 am |
|
 |
tombolt
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:38 am Posts: 2967 Location: Dorchester, Dorset
|
+1
|
Fri May 21, 2010 8:23 am |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
+1 Yes too many cases of women who claim that they were raped when they are ashamed of what they did. The case of the female lawyer last year who got drunk and had sex with a guy, afterwards she claimed she was raped because she would never have slept with him if sober, so he must have raped her. He was acquitted but his reputation trashed.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Fri May 21, 2010 8:25 am |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
Agreed. For the women who genuinely suffer, I'd like to see the rapist strung up! But for the false accusations, I want to see anonymity... That said, there was a case in Germany, where the man had an affair with a neighbour for 6 months, then called it off. The woman went to the police and cried rape. Before it was reported in the press, the local community had the full SP, through the housewives grapevine! There was, obviously, overwhelming evidence of him having had sex with the woman. The man's wife was ostracised and couldn't go to work - the boss sent her home - and the children were bullied at school. The man lost his job. Even the wife's "friends" didn't want to have anything to do with her! In the end, the neighbour retracted her accusation, but the damage had been done.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Fri May 21, 2010 9:04 am |
|
 |
veato
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am Posts: 5550 Location: Nottingham
|
+1 to all the above
_________________Twitter Blogflickr
|
Fri May 21, 2010 10:44 am |
|
 |
didgeman
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:18 pm Posts: 289
|
BUT, if we are to grant anonymity in a case like this, it will have to be granted in any case where there are huge stigmas attached to the crime, e.g. child abuse .. where does that stop?
Didge.
_________________eurotech
|
Fri May 21, 2010 11:36 am |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
It doesn't. Nor should it.
|
Fri May 21, 2010 11:46 am |
|
|