Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Network upgrade 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 1171
Reply with quote
Ok, I looked at the DHCP setting and "Use Router as DHCP server" option is ticked.

However I have an "Address reservation" option there to assign IPs manually to MAC addresses. So I assigned IPs to my main pc and my server so I won't have to worry about updating port forwarding rules from now on. I am not worried about other IPs that connect wirelessly so I leave them as they are.

Image

So I should be sorted now, right?

_________________
Image
Free Sim with £5 credit


Sat May 22, 2010 3:56 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 140
Location: The Interwebs
Reply with quote
yep that looks fine, shouldn't have any worries on the router side.
if the ip change still persists then its a client issue.

_________________
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
- Douglas Adams


Sun May 23, 2010 8:42 am
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
Do you use DHCP? I can't think of any reason the addresses would have changed, unless you use DHCP and normally leave the machine(s) turned on. :?



The routing table would have changed from adding the switch so it probably got a tad confused.

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Mon May 24, 2010 9:32 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Um, how exactly?

There is still only one subnet - the router doesn't care, or even know, how many switches are involved.

_________________
Image


Mon May 24, 2010 2:24 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 140
Location: The Interwebs
Reply with quote
it still has a routing table...

if the ips have changed on the clients and the routing table has stale entries in it, the router will use the entry on the table before anything else. A hardware restart usually clears it unless the routes are static.

if its a layer 3 switch it has its own table and will further confuse the situation. if its a router with a four port switch, thats essentially a layer 3 switch as unless the routing functions are turned off, thats exactly what its doing.

_________________
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
- Douglas Adams


Mon May 24, 2010 3:35 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Well in my opinion the routing tables will still be exactly the same after adding the extra switch.

_________________
Image


Mon May 24, 2010 4:02 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 140
Location: The Interwebs
Reply with quote
Nope if they are using RIP they will start talking to each other as neighbours on the same subnet and updating each others routing tables.

*Edit* you aren't just adding another layer 2 switch, you are adding a router that you are using as a switch... subtle difference.

_________________
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
- Douglas Adams


Mon May 24, 2010 4:16 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
The product he listed was this, a bog standard layer 2 switch. I assume that's what he used - I can't see any reference to anything else.

In which case, there won't be any change.

Have I missed a reference to a different product?

_________________
Image


Mon May 24, 2010 4:25 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 140
Location: The Interwebs
Reply with quote
O.k. my fault :oops:

think I was thinking of a similar tread on another forum where an old router was used as a switch, which was giving the above issues.
so its 2 clients one non managed switch.

Also I think from the posts, there is no no issue to fix. seems that the IPs have been added to the reserved list and everything is talking to each other as intended.

As to why the IPs would have changed. there are still routing tables on the clients, also its possible the dhcp leases just ran out at that time and renewed to different ones. can happen if there have been iphones or other wireless devices connecting whilst the others were off.

Main thing is OP is up and running and initial queries all resolved.

_________________
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
- Douglas Adams


Mon May 24, 2010 5:04 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Bluespider wrote:
its possible the dhcp leases just ran out at that time and renewed to different ones.


Yeah, that's what I think happened here - when they came back up, they came up in a different order/there were different devices on the network, so they got given a different address.

Quote:
Main thing is OP is up and running and initial queries all resolved.


Deffo. :)

_________________
Image


Mon May 24, 2010 5:43 pm
Profile
Has a life

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:18 pm
Posts: 17
Reply with quote
Bluespider wrote:
Yes there should be no worries as long as you don't reuse the same IP address and they are all on the same subnet (if you are using 192.168.x.x then that should be 255.255.255.0)


Well no, 192.168.x.x would be 255.255.0.0 but I'm sure you know that. ;)


Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:25 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
opensvr wrote:
Bluespider wrote:
Yes there should be no worries as long as you don't reuse the same IP address and they are all on the same subnet (if you are using 192.168.x.x then that should be 255.255.255.0)


Well no, 192.168.x.x would be 255.255.0.0 but I'm sure you know that. ;)

I'm sure you've just confused a few people who were perfectly happy before they read that :lol:

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:39 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
opensvr wrote:
Bluespider wrote:
Yes there should be no worries as long as you don't reuse the same IP address and they are all on the same subnet (if you are using 192.168.x.x then that should be 255.255.255.0)


Well no, 192.168.x.x would be 255.255.0.0 but I'm sure you know that. ;)

I'm sure you've just confused a few people who were perfectly happy before they read that :lol:

I resisted commenting (8-p)

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:13 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
I didn't even notice it! :P

_________________
Image


Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:28 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 140
Location: The Interwebs
Reply with quote
me either :oops: :lol:

_________________
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
- Douglas Adams


Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:31 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.