Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Deaths as Israeli forces storm Gaza aid ship 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 195838.stm

Fcuksake, @rseholes all round there...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon May 31, 2010 11:26 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
No matter what they say it was in International waters and hence it was piracy. It's about time the UN enforced the countless International Laws that Israel have been breaking for decades, they can't just do what they like and paint themselves as the sole victims.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Mon May 31, 2010 11:31 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
adidan wrote:
No matter what they say it was in International waters and hence it was piracy. It's about time the UN enforced the countless International Laws that Israel have been breaking for decades, they can't just do what they like and paint themselves as the sole victims.

But they can and they will.

Zionism and Semitism are now seen as being the same thing. This leaves people such as myself in a weird position: I'm a semite but an anti-Zionist; I am jewish but oppose the nation state of Israel.

Secondly, the US Jewish lobby has a stranglehold over the US government because of the massive amount they donate to campaign funds. The UN is then crippled because the US can (and does) veto any security council action against Israel.

_________________
Jim

Image


Mon May 31, 2010 12:46 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
The realpolitik is the rest of the world thinks they're as bad as each other and will happily ignore both of them as much as possible. Just look at this one - Israelis storm the boats and activists are killed so the Israeli embassy in Istanbul gets invaded and trashed. Were the embassy staff involved? Hardly. Did they fire the shots on the boats? Categorically not. The result is whatever moral high ground the arab world could have claimed over the incident was almost immediately lost. You can't insist someone else conforms to the rule of law when you're perfectly happy to ignore it yourself. Until both sides renounce violence, neither side is going to get what it wants.


Mon May 31, 2010 1:18 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
I don't like Israel - I think they are like a playground bully knowing that no-one will lift a finger to stop them as they have USA to run to for help.

Now if those ships had been escorted in International Waters by a Turkish frigate then it would have made it very interesting as would Israel have fired on a Nato country ship?

_________________
Image


Mon May 31, 2010 6:53 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
JohnSheridan wrote:
Now if those ships had been escorted in International Waters by a Turkish frigate then it would have made it very interesting as would Israel have fired on a Nato country ship?

It was pretty fair guess that the blockade breakers would get boarded to be honest with you. Once that happened it was always going to be a toss up as to whether it was going to get bloody or not. No government in the EU or nearby is going to actively put themselves between the Palestinians and the Israelis like that. What would they have to gain from doing so? Diplomatic gestures, yes. Trade measures certainly. But actually put their troops somewhere where the Israelis might end up shooting at them and therefore precipitate the biggest international crisis for decades when it would profit them not at all to do so? With a UN mandate and backed by a serious coalition? Possibly. But nobody is going to do that on their own. The world is too cynical a place for that.

The Israeli officers in control and the troops who boarded the ships and fired on civilians should certainly be prosecuted but running the blockade was a fairly provocative act and history suggests the Israeli army doesn't need much provoking...


Mon May 31, 2010 7:27 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
It will be interesting to hear about the cargo manifest.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon May 31, 2010 7:32 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
It will be interesting to hear about the cargo manifest.

Sadly, I have a feeling getting an objectively verified list will be difficult. The Israelis will claim one thing, the activists another. And so it will go on...


Mon May 31, 2010 7:37 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 447
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=terror ... rt=10&sa=N

This link is a search for terrorist state on google and israel comes up a hell of alot in association.


Mon May 31, 2010 11:50 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
ISRAEL JUST MAKING IT EASIER FOR GUARDIAN READERS TO LOOK GOOD

ISRAEL'S attack on a Palestinian aid ship will make it easier for Guardian readers to sound as if they know what they are talking about, it was claimed last night.

Experts warned Tel Aviv that every time it launches a seemingly unprovoked or disproportionate attack it allows at least 10,000 cretins to say something at a dinner party that everyone then agrees with.

Dr Martin Bishop, of the Institute for Studies, said: "Benjamin Netanyahu has to realise that his aggressive stance towards Hamas and Hezbollah is playing into the hands of some of the worst people in the world.

"I simply cannot sit through another dinner party with some speccie [LIFTED] spouting off about Israel while all the single, attractive women around the table stare at him like he was Martin Luther King.

"Meanwhile I'm sitting there knowing it's actually a tad more complicated and that the Israelis are dealing with people who will not rest until it they've all been wiped from the face of the Earth and if it was us then we might just get a bit jumpy too, particularly if someone had tried to do it before.

"But if I come out and say that then this vegetarian ponce is going to accuse me of wanting to make a fancy cocktail with the blood of Palestinian babies and there goes any chance I may have of picking off the drunkest woman from the pack.

"If they could just protect their borders against exploding maniacs with a little more tact then that would help me enormously in my quest for a really good blow job."

But Julian Cook, a grade six Guardian reader from Highbury, said: "There's a fascinating piece by Jonathan Freedland which sums up my feelings exactly - and he's Jewish so that means I must be right. At least I think he's Jewish. He certainly looks like a Jew."

And Helen Archer, a social worker from Finsbury Park who keeps a photo of Polly Toynbee in her purse, added: "Israel are acting like Nazis - there, I said it."

Meanwhile, Mr Netanyahu has refused to apologise for the the attack and instead staged a press conference where he accused a two month old kitten of giving him a funny look, before tossing it casually under a passing steamroller.

Dr Bishop added: "Oh for [LIFTED]'s sake."


There's a lot of truth around all of that, and The Guardian really were pushing their luck with the moral crap today. Mind you, so were half the press who wanted to sell you a story rather than the facts :(

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:36 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
eddie543 wrote:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=terrorist+state&hl=en&rlz=1B3GGGL_enGB259GB259&prmd=v&start=10&sa=N

This link is a search for terrorist state on google and israel comes up a hell of alot in association.

Let's hope the UN security council takes this fine objective piece of evidence into account when it makes it's final decision.

Lots of interesting video footage on newsnight tonight. First of all what appears to be an Israeli commando with an SMG, when the Israeli military are claiming all they were carrying were non-lethal 'paintball guns' (probably a bit more powerful than your average one) and sidearms for their own protection in an emergency. Then on the other side one of the 'peace activists' who for some reason had brought along a flak mask (like the gas masks the SAS are always pictures wearing that protects against both tear gas and stun grenades) and what looks like a pretty pre-fabricated and rather nasty melee weapon of some sort. Guess both sides were being somewhat economical with the truth. Also, the number of casualties seems to have halved from what the protesters were originally claiming and it's gone fairly quiet about how many if any Israeli soldiers were wounded/injured. Plus a lot of footage that rather suggests the Israelis didn't have a clue about what they were doing...

Looks increasingly like a botched boarding of a ship where there were a group of people who were spoiling for a fight. Not really a surprise that the situation went bad.


Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:32 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
adidan wrote:
No matter what they say it was in International waters and hence it was piracy.
Depends. Was there a UN resolution preventing this ship from going to it's destination?........ No, then it IS legally piracy.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:12 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
adidan wrote:
No matter what they say it was in International waters and hence it was piracy.
Depends. Was there a UN resolution preventing this ship from going to it's destination?........ No, then it IS legally piracy.

It would be funny if Israel tried to use UN resolutions in any argument about anything TBH.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:49 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
adidan wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
adidan wrote:
No matter what they say it was in International waters and hence it was piracy.
Depends. Was there a UN resolution preventing this ship from going to it's destination?........ No, then it IS legally piracy.

It would be funny if Israel tried to use UN resolutions in any argument about anything TBH.

Well quite. Israel's position seems to be that there is a statute of international law (and I've checked and it is there) that allows a nation to board and search any ship bringing goods into a port which is under a legal blockade. So the question actually is not if the boarding was legal, but if the blockade they were trying to get through is legal. The law is somewhat ambiguous about whether boarding is legal in international waters or just if the ships enter your own territorial waters, but if it's the latter it's a somewhat useless law as you can always board ships in your own territorial waters anyway, so I assume it's the former.

My personal opinion is the blockade isn't legal since it doesn't have a recognised legal mandate but I can't find anything that says that's a requirement.

Either way, shooting people under these circumstances certainly isn't legal.

Jon


Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:07 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.