Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Apple revamps Mac Mini as skinny HDMI box 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5161
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
Quote:
Apple has sliced roughly half of the metal off its old Mac Mini and re-released the starter computer as a box that now looks a lot like the Apple TV. And it has an HDMI port.


Continue reading here

Has the price gone up too? :shock:
I would love one of these boxes sitting under my TV (when I finally get round to buying a TV), but for this new price, I might look around...


Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:13 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
forquare1 wrote:
Has the price gone up too? :shock:

Yeah, now starts at £649!!! (used to be £499).
Frankly, £649 is just far too expensive for what you get (or rather don't get - no keyboard, mouse, screen). Nice design, but really expensive for what started out as a low-end entry mode to get Windows users to switch to a Mac.

forquare1 wrote:
I would love one of these boxes sitting under my TV (when I finally get round to buying a TV), but for this new price, I might look around...

You might want to hold out for an updated AppleTV, which rumour has it that it will be a lot cheaper, have no (or only minimal) storage in the box itself but will store and download content from the cloud (presumably MobileMe?) on demand. Just a rumour, but a strong indication that it's for real - and the price was rumoured to be just $99 - what that will be in £s who knows. I'd imagine it will use the same redesigned case as this new Mac mini and may follow shortly... Could be worth waiting for?

_________________
* Steve *

* Witty statement goes here *


Last edited by steve74 on Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:33 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
I know it's not a new-feature, but the article caused me to follow links and look at OS-X Server. I reckon that on a mini would make a pretty decent cross-platform server in a tiny package. I appreciate it's not going to be for everyone, and I could do it using OSS (In fact some of the Apple server stuff is open-sourced), but this + seperate storage for backing up user profiles, docs and music should do my phone in the future. I'm starting to think Photos/Lr Catalogs[sic] (and other such big-file project - I'm thinking audio/video stuff) will have to be treated seperately, although I'm not quite sure what the best approach will be. At the moment it just about all fits onto my MacBook, and so is backed up with everything else, but I know this won't be the case forever, and the idea of accessing gigabytes and gigabytes of data over a network for searching does not appeal!

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:55 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5161
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
steve74 wrote:
forquare1 wrote:
I would love one of these boxes sitting under my TV (when I finally get round to buying a TV), but for this new price, I might look around...

You might want to hold out for an updated AppleTV, which rumour has it that it will be a lot cheaper, have no (or only minimal) storage in the box itself but will store and download content from the cloud (presumably MobileMe?) on demand. Just a rumour, but a strong indication that it's for real - and the price was rumoured to be just $99 - what that will be in £s who knows. I'd imagine it will use the same redesigned case as this new Mac mini and may follow shortly... Could be worth waiting for?


I've considered it, but I'd like to have the greater flexibility a proper OS gives, rather than the "Front Row only" type OS...


Edd, I agree, I'd like the School of Art to buy one for their Mac room, would simplify things and is nice and small so wouldn't get in the way.


Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:25 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
It is a little too expensive to replace the Apple TV.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:09 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
I know it's not a new-feature, but the article caused me to follow links and look at OS-X Server. I reckon that on a mini would make a pretty decent cross-platform server in a tiny package. I appreciate it's not going to be for everyone, and I could do it using OSS (In fact some of the Apple server stuff is open-sourced), but this + seperate storage for backing up user profiles, docs and music should do my phone in the future. I'm starting to think Photos/Lr Catalogs[sic] (and other such big-file project - I'm thinking audio/video stuff) will have to be treated seperately, although I'm not quite sure what the best approach will be. At the moment it just about all fits onto my MacBook, and so is backed up with everything else, but I know this won't be the case forever, and the idea of accessing gigabytes and gigabytes of data over a network for searching does not appeal!

I depends what you need... An HP small business server costs less and is more powerful - but big and noisy...

If it is just doing file and print server duties, the mini would make a good power saving server. A small intranet would also be a possibility. But for app servers etc. it would soon show its limits, with only SATA drives, mobile processor, slow memory and a chipset ethernet port...

It also has the advantage of no client restrictions, unlike Windows (you need to buy CALs for additional concurrent users on the server platform).

For our SQL Server or Citrix servers, it would be a non-starter (the former has a fibre attached SAN and they all have redundant power supplies and redundant ethernet ports... But I'd still like to see one in action, it could make a cheap way of mirroring main servers, for failover duties.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:26 am
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
But for app servers etc. it would soon show its limits, with only SATA drives, mobile processor, slow memory and a chipset ethernet port...

Yup, I was thinking home-server type setup. WHS, AFAIK, is fairly Windows-centric. There don't be seem to be many Mac-apps that are intended for concurrent multi-user access, but for most DBs for personal projects I either use Bento on a standalone machine, or MySQL hosted centrally. The other option is a much cheaper 1U box in a rack under the stairs. Anyhoo, it's years before these sorts of decisions need to be made.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:15 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
It's a very nice looking machine (with or without the optical drive) but the price is just silly.
I suppose some of the cost (in £'s) is down to how weak sterling is but it's still far too much money for far too little Mac IMHO.
I dread to think how much the new Mac Pro will cost whenever it's released if this is the sort of thing Apple is trying to pull.

Someone needs to go up to Mr. Jobs and give him a slap before he disappears up his backside completely and takes the Mac platform with him. I wonder if there is an App for that (doubt it would get through the vetting process).

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:40 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Reply with quote
As I blogged previously, if you spec it up slightly it works out more expensive than a 21" imac with a faster CPU. Think the extra £100 was a bit of an error!

_________________
G.


Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:20 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Unless they are planning to release a new iMac and price that ridiculously high, too. :|

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:30 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 710
Reply with quote
As with the not allowing ipad sims to work in Iphone4s, shows a certain arrogance, which apple has always had but seems to be increaseing

_________________
No Apples were used in the making of this post.


Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:33 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
mikepgood wrote:
As with the not allowing ipad sims to work in Iphone4s, shows a certain arrogance, which apple has always had but seems to be increaseing


Is that because they use the different size cards?

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:46 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
Is that because they use the different size cards?

No, they both use Micro-SIMs, but they're configured differently, whatever that means... This explains it better than me!

_________________
* Steve *

* Witty statement goes here *


Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:52 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
What does surprise me about the specification, is that, for the price, there is only 2GB RAM and that there is only a Core 2 Duo inside. For that price, I'd expect at least a 2.24Ghz Core i3 and 4GB RAM in the base machine - heck, I'm buying Core i3 Toshiba Tecra laptops for less than the Mac mini; and they include Core i3, 4GB RAM, 320GB HD, 15.4" 1366x768 display, webcam, BT, Wi-Fi, SD card slot, 4 USB, E-SATA, Firewire, DVD-writer, keyboard, stereo speakers... For the price Apple are charging, I could probably squeeze in the docking station as well!

Considering everything Apple aren't giving, that is a high price for outdated technology...

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Thu Jun 17, 2010 6:35 am
Profile ICQ
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
New Apple Mac mini review: first look

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/06/15 ... irst-look/

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:16 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.