Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
BA pay out over child seat row. 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
News CLICKY
Quite right to. I'd be furious if I was that bloke too.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:28 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
WTF! Just WTF?!?

So are all blokes potential paedos now?

FFS this is mother-fraking, what the frak, frak, frakky frak frak!

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:31 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I remember the old thread on this just before it went to court.

Anyway, F**k you BA!

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:49 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
Good outcome all round I think tbh.

_________________
Jim

Image


Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:52 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
Good outcome all round I think tbh.

Not good enough. Despite paying him compensation, they're still saying the policy is valid and it's still in force.
Quote:
BA apologised to the businessman but denied the policy was discriminatory.

This isn't over until they scrap their stupid rule.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:27 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
rustybucket wrote:
Good outcome all round I think tbh.

Not good enough. Despite paying him compensation, they're still saying the policy is valid and it's still in force.

:? I thought they were reviewing it.

If not then they can bite my rusty metal ar*e.

_________________
Jim

Image


Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:24 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Women can be child abusers as well. So they really need to look at the rule re children travelling alone.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Jun 25, 2010 12:25 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Women can be child abusers as well. So they really need to look at the rule re children travelling alone.


Yes, they should now travel with a guardian, who happen to be the most likely abuser of a child.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:09 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Women can be child abusers as well. So they really need to look at the rule re children travelling alone.


Yes, they should now travel with a guardian, who happen to be the most likely abuser of a child.

Exactly and makes the rule ridiculous. Though I vaguely remember a Hannibal Lector film where he is travelling alone and has a food carton of brain and the child asks to try it. What were the airline thinking? He could have been a child molester!!!!

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:12 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.