Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Advisors urge new UK climate policies 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_ ... 456314.stm

I wish I could ignore day to day life the way that team seems to, and what if they are right about GW? Are idiots like that really gonna do anything useful? :evil:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:21 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Quote:
The government says it is committed to being "the greenest ever", and is expected to bring in new energy legislation within its first year.

The test of the government will be the policies they put in place over the next one to two years

The is the committee's second annual report to parliament, and follows a year in which UK greenhouse gas emissions plummeted by 8.6%, mainly due to the recession but also because of increased fossil fuel prices.

"The recession has created the illusion that progress is being made to reduce emissions," said CCC chairman Lord Adair Turner.

"Our analysis shows that this is almost wholly due to a reduction in economic activity, and not from new measures being introduced to tackle climate change.

I fully expect our coalition to be greenwashing on a massive scale. Insulation would be very beneficial. Labour were doing that but not on a big enough scale. Every home and business should have been eligible, and it should have been paid for by a large carbon tax on energy.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:48 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Amnesia, I agree - but they should only introduce the carbon tax in a few years time.

If they were to announce that in five years time energy companies would be heavily taxed for their carbon output, they would invest in green energy today so they can try to avoid that tax in the future.

Energy prices would rise, but not overnight as they would if they introduced the tax too quickly.

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:55 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
Quote:
"We had less than 1 Gigawatt (GW) of renewable capacity added to the system in 2009," said CCC chief executive David Kennedy"

Perhaps that's because wind farms were asked to frakin shut themselves off so as not to overload the grid.

FFS.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:11 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
adidan wrote:
Quote:
"We had less than 1 Gigawatt (GW) of renewable capacity added to the system in 2009," said CCC chief executive David Kennedy"

Perhaps that's because wind farms were paid to frakin shut themselves off so as not to overload the grid.

FFS.


Slightly edited.

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:12 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
Slightly edited.

Thank you kindly. :)

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:17 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Idiots.

That is all.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:12 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
Amnesia, I agree - but they should only introduce the carbon tax in a few years time.

If they were to announce that in five years time energy companies would be heavily taxed for their carbon output, they would invest in green energy today so they can try to avoid that tax in the future.

Energy prices would rise, but not overnight as they would if they introduced the tax too quickly.

Yes but if you did that the government would never raise the tax in five years as it would always find an excuse to stall it. We would be no better off in five years because everyone will have thought that it was a ploy to get us to invest in efficiency. They would still be unprepared in five years time.

No what I would do is have a high carbon tax that could replace airline passenger duty and be applied to aircraft fuel as well, it would replace some of the petrol duty (much is not for anti greenhouse gases anyway) and it would apply to all fossil fuel energy generation. The money raised would ALL be used to give grants or vouchers for low energy lights loft and wall insulation and would be eligible to all. So in year one it will mean that collectively everyone is more insulated. Over time the amount paid back in grants etc will be reduced and could be used for clearing the deficit. In the mean time it makes people far more aware of the true cost of energy and means that they will look for cheaper running appliances to buy. Also why shouldn't businesses benefit from the grants or from extra allowances to cut energy usage? It would make renewables more cost effective and if people sign up for green energy contracts they can be exempt from the tax. If energy companies still wish to use fossil fuels they cannot pass the costs on to green energy contracts. They would want more efficient generation because it would benefit them directly.

Also by switching the emphasis onto efficiency the power companies could be forced to have regulated energy prices for low usage annually, so not impacting on the poor elderly or efficient, but higher unregulated prices for bigger users so the companies could still make their profits.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:33 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.