Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Extra £100 to pay energy bill by cash or cheque 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/pers ... heque.html

Quote:
Energy customers who pay their bill by cash or cheque are being charged an extra £100 a year more on their bills, compared with those that pay by direct debit.
This premium has worsened over the last two years, according to the industry watchdog Ofgem, which said it was monitoring carefully to see if any companies were unfairly penalising customers.
People who pay by cash or cheque are called standard credit customers by the industry, and the extra £100 they pay on average has emerged as fears mount that companies are trying to stop the use of cash to pay bills. The industry has already announced that it intends to scrap the chequebook by 2018.

This is clearly wrong. The government should stop companies discriminating against certain types of payment.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:18 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
This is clearly wrong. The government should stop companies discriminating against certain types of payment.

How is it wrong? Certain types of payment cost more to process. Why should I subsidise people who choose to be awkward?

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:35 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
This has been looked into before, and they get away with it because energy companies argue that it's not a penalty for paying by cash/cheque, but rather a discount for paying by Direct Debit.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:43 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
This is clearly wrong. The government should stop companies discriminating against certain types of payment.

How is it wrong? Certain types of payment cost more to process. Why should I subsidise people who choose to be awkward?

Yes but a £100 per year more? What if you had no bank account? If you pay by cash you could pay it directly into a bank using a payment slip, this would cost no more than a direct debit.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:04 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but a £100 per year more? What if you had no bank account? If you pay by cash you could pay it directly into a bank using a payment slip, this would cost no more than a direct debit.


A payment slip requires handling on a monthly/quaterly basis. Direct debit is a one-off setup and then automatic.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:08 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but a £100 per year more? What if you had no bank account? If you pay by cash you could pay it directly into a bank using a payment slip, this would cost no more than a direct debit.


A payment slip requires handling on a monthly/quaterly basis. Direct debit is a one-off setup and then automatic.


The bank will chage (the business) a low rate for a DD (say 0.5p / transaction) while a much higher fee (say 15p) per credit slip. On top of this DD's will feed into automatic account systems ( customer account numbers etc) while paper vouchers will often require manual reconcilliation

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:22 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but a £100 per year more? What if you had no bank account? If you pay by cash you could pay it directly into a bank using a payment slip, this would cost no more than a direct debit.


A payment slip requires handling on a monthly/quaterly basis. Direct debit is a one-off setup and then automatic.

Yes but you are still sent a bill, whether it is paid or not. The handling can be done by the banks and the payment codes do show who the payment is from. It is cheaper than cheques but banks prefer automated payments because they can get rid of staff. hence they can price such payments cheaper.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:26 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but you are still sent a bill, whether it is paid or not. The handling can be done by the banks and the payment codes do show who the payment is from. It is cheaper than cheques but banks prefer automated payments because they can get rid of staff. hence they can price such payments cheaper.

I don't get a bill for some services, I choose paperless billing where possible.

But you're right, because they don't have to employ so many staff is the primary reason it's cheaper for them.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:52 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but you are still sent a bill, whether it is paid or not.

I can't remember the last time I received a paper bill for anything TBH.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:53 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but you are still sent a bill, whether it is paid or not. The handling can be done by the banks and the payment codes do show who the payment is from. It is cheaper than cheques but banks prefer automated payments because they can get rid of staff. hence they can price such payments cheaper.

I don't get a bill for some services, I choose paperless billing where possible.

But you're right, because they don't have to employ so many staff is the primary reason it's cheaper for them.

Though I still cannot see that the extra cost for a business is £100 per year for what is effectively four bills. If so many already pay by standing order or direct debit then there should few extra costs for dealing with so few. I pay by direct debit as well so am not affected but I am aware that older customers prefer paper bills, then paying by cheque.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:10 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
This is clearly wrong. The government should stop companies discriminating against certain types of payment.

How is it wrong? Certain types of payment cost more to process. Why should I subsidise people who choose to be awkward?
+1
Also, people who pay by cash/cheque often pay late. Why should the power companies be out of pocket?
I suppose there's an arguement for a lower cost, but with heavy fines for paying late.....

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:52 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
This is clearly wrong. The government should stop companies discriminating against certain types of payment.

How is it wrong? Certain types of payment cost more to process. Why should I subsidise people who choose to be awkward?
+1
Also, people who pay by cash/cheque often pay late. Why should the power companies be out of pocket?
I suppose there's an arguement for a lower cost, but with heavy fines for paying late.....

Yes but you could have a penalty if mot paid by a certain date. That would encourage quick payment.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:05 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
This is clearly wrong. The government should stop companies discriminating against certain types of payment.

How is it wrong? Certain types of payment cost more to process. Why should I subsidise people who choose to be awkward?
+1
Also, people who pay by cash/cheque often pay late. Why should the power companies be out of pocket?
I suppose there's an arguement for a lower cost, but with heavy fines for paying late.....


It would never wash, the OFT would strike the "heavy fine" down for being unfair. Any penalties must represent the actual costs the company incurs for late payment, no more.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:15 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Also, people who pay by cash/cheque often pay late. Why should the power companies be out of pocket?
I suppose there's an arguement for a lower cost, but with heavy fines for paying late.....


We choose to pay some of our bills online with a debit card. We never pay late, but we don't get the discount. How is that fair?

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:23 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
We choose to pay some of our bills online with a debit card. We never pay late, but we don't get the discount. How is that fair?

l3v1ck wrote:
I suppose there's an arguement for a lower cost, but with heavy fines for paying late.....

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:31 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.