Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Stephen Fry: BBC should give people more credit for being 's 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Stephen Fry: BBC should give people more credit for being 'smart'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... smart.html

Quote:
Fry’s latest comments renew his fierce attack last month on “infantilism” at the BBC, when he described flagship family dramas such as Merlin and Doctor Who as being “like a chicken nugget”.
In an interview with today’s Radio Times, Fry said about his recent series on Wagner: “I think programmes only work if they matter to you, because I think audiences are smart - even though you wouldn’t believe the BBC thinks so - and one thing they are particularly smart about is when a presenter is faking. Because I have so many passions I don’t want to do things I’m not genuinely interested in.”
Fry said that he did not wish to provoke a “sandstorm of horror” with his new comments, even though they come just a month after a lecture at Bafta in which he said that “Infantilism’s the problem. It’s just shocking. The only dramas the BBC will boast about are Merlin and Doctor Who, which are fine but they’re children’s programmes. They’re not for adults. They are like a chicken nugget.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:29 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
I have to agree –programme like Horizon used to be really technical and you used to have to listen hard to understand them – now any science programmes seemed to be aimed at illiterate chavs . By all means have basic science programs (like Brainiac) but lets have something that’s a little more in-depth

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:16 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Well Panorama has been dumbed down as much as possible. It has not attracted the chavs, and it has lost its core audience. The same could be said of Horizon. Too many programs aim to appeal to the masses rather than be a challenge. Overall it is a damn sight better than ITV, almost nothing science related.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:48 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
I have to agree –programme like Horizon used to be really technical and you used to have to listen hard to understand them – now any science programmes seemed to be aimed at illiterate chavs . By all means have basic science programs (like Brainiac) but lets have something that’s a little more in-depth


+1

Although the Brian Cox "Wonders" series was superb and didn't patronise.

I get fed up when an interviewer or anchor on the news channel interrupts and answer to explain what an already obvious acronym stands for. I already know. If someone doesn't they can go look it up, and it they can't even do that just ignore them.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:51 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5161
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
I get fed up when an interviewer or anchor on the news channel interrupts and answer to explain what an already obvious acronym stands for. I already know. If someone doesn't they can go look it up, and it they can't even do that just ignore them.


I hate it when they say what the acronym stands for, but not the acronym itself. In many cases I know what the acronym is, though not a clue what it stands for.


Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:07 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Well Panorama has been dumbed down as much as possible. It has not attracted the chavs, and it has lost its core audience. The same could be said of Horizon. Too many programs aim to appeal to the masses rather than be a challenge. Overall it is a damn sight better than ITV, almost nothing science related.


what with the big red button these days, why not have the same show but with alternate commentary to cater for all levels of knowledge?

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:24 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.