Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Woman arrested for swearing at yobs 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... -yobs.html

Quote:
A woman was arrested and hauled to court for swearing at a group of youths after a brick was thrown through her window.
After being cleared of all wrongdoing, Natalie Harrop criticised the police for failing to deal with the vandals.
She was arrested after disobeying a police officer's order to go back inside her house after confronting the group of youths who had earlier chased her boyfriend. She claimed she had been locked out.

Sounds like a jobsworth trying to achieve arrest targets.

Quote:
Miss Harrop was charged with using abusive words within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress.

If they are old enough to throw bricks through windows they are old enough to hear a few swear words.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:25 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 strikes again. It's absurd that a Policeman can arrest you for using harsh language, sometimes "you're a [LIFTED] [LIFTED]" is the only language they understand.

Abolish it.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:35 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:42 am
Posts: 798
Location: land of the free, Bexhill-on-Sea
Reply with quote
I think it was maybe the officer whose ears were offended so.


Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:23 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
E. F. Benson wrote:
I think it was maybe the officer whose ears were offended so.

Maybe she called the gang pigs and he thought it was aimed at him. ;)

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:35 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
No wonder the public have little faith in the police. :roll:

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:07 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 strikes again. It's absurd that a Policeman can arrest you for using harsh language, sometimes "you're a [LIFTED] [LIFTED]" is the only language they understand.

Abolish it.


I disagree.

Sure, it was abused in this case but that doesn't mean it always is.

_________________
Image


Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:42 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
There are times when it is valid but if the police go for the easy option and arrest home owners protecting their property they destroy the support of the public. The judge or magistrate should be able to award penalties against the police and CPS if they bring silly cases like this against innocent people. It would help restore public confidence and make them think twice about such cases.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:25 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
It would help restore public confidence and make them think twice about such cases.

+1 :D

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:46 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
It would help restore public confidence and make them think twice about such cases.

+1 :D


+1 ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:02 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
I disagree.

Sure, it was abused in this case but that doesn't mean it always is.


There has been a report commissioned before (the name of which currently escapes me) that found the power is routinely abused.

Perhaps one of the most famous examples is this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfo ... 606022.stm

The point of section 5 is to give the Police power to act when someone says something that does, or is likely to alarm or distress someone nearby, for example shouting anti-Semitic remarks in a Jewish area, making threats etc. Not only have the Police used the power when no-one is around to hear the remarks (thus it can't be likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress), but the Police have been ticked off by a Judge before for claiming it was they who suffered harassment, alarm or distress (which the Judge dismissed, stating that the nature of their role meant they would encounter harsh language and insults).

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:24 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
Only in England :lol: that sortof arrest is unheard of here

_________________
Image


Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:03 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.