Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Barnardo's wants most prosecutions of under-12s to end 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Ministers are being urged to drop criminal prosecutions for under-12s in all but the most serious of cases, such as rape, murder and manslaughter.

Children's charity Barnardo's says there are cheaper and more effective ways to tackle offending by young children.

These include family-wide intervention projects for offending children, who are often close to going into care.

The government says the key to tackling youth crime is early intervention.

Barnardo's says prosecution and conviction are necessary for very young children who commit the most serious offences.

But it wants the criminal age of responsibility to be raised from 10 to 12, for all cases except for murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, rape and aggravated sexual assault.

According to the Barnardo's report - From Playground To Prison: The Conveyor Belt To Crime - more than 5,600 10- and 11-year-olds go through the criminal justice system each year, with the vast majority being given a reprimand or final warning.

In 2008, only four were sentenced for more serious violent offences.
'Chaotic family life'

But despite the fact that the majority of children are committing low-level crimes, reoffending rates are high.

They run at 40% for those given a referral order and at 70% for those given a community sentence.

Barnardo's argues there is nothing to be gained from criminalising very young children in this way and that it only heightens the chance of further reoffending.

This is because children who offend at this age tend to have huge welfare needs.

Many have speech and learning difficulties and operate at a level well below their age.

And they come from extremely chaotic family backgrounds and are often close to going into care, the charity says.

These issues need to be tackled to prevent further problems, the report suggests.
Family intervention

Its chief executive and former director general of the Prison Service, Martin Narey, said: "The primary weakness of our current response is that addressing criminal behaviour by a very young child through punishment alone is - transparently - nonsense.

"Our response has to be directed at the parents and sometimes the wider family, because early criminality so often flows from inadequate parenting, and a lack of discipline and boundaries in a child's life, which allow mischief to grow into much more troubling behaviour."

Instead of prosecution, Barnardo's calls for targeted work with families, challenging children and adults to face up to and accept responsibility for their actions and behaviour.

Barnardo's estimates that by taking this approach, £6m would be saved from court appearances alone.

Mr Narey said: "Family-based approaches are much more likely to be effective than the conviction of the child on his or her own."

And independent research suggests these sorts of family intervention projects do work.

One study pointed to a 64% reduction in anti-social behaviour and a 58% drop in truancy, exclusions and bad behaviour.

Although there are numerous projects around the country, there is no consistent approach at local level.

And it is not clear whether the government will continue to fund them after the comprehensive spending review in the autumn.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said it would consider the report's findings as part of its review of sentencing and rehabilitation.

He added that the government was committed to preventing youth crime and anti-social behaviour, as well as supporting young people to stop them entering the criminal justice system in the first place.

"The key to tackling youth crime is intervening early on and the majority of children are not prosecuted in a courtroom.

"Their actions are addressed using out of court disposals and robust intervention to prevent them entering the criminal justice system," he said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11262839

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:35 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
While I agree that often these kids and their families need help in many cases they know what they are doing is wrong and to remove any sanctions against them would let them put two fingers up to the law.

Instead of putting them through the costs of the courts bring back the stocks – I’m sure 30 min of being jeered at / pelted with rotten fruit would make them think twice

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:14 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
The problem is that these families need help and courts could be used for lesser offences but not custodial. If the parents were fined they could not afford to pay, but community service might make a difference. They will definitely discipline the child after the loss of their Jeremy Kyle time.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:39 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
Instead of putting them through the costs of the courts bring back the stocks – I’m sure 30 min of being jeered at / pelted with rotten fruit would make them think twice


I've thought for a long time that bringing back the stocks would be a great idea. People will put up with a lot, but not being humiliated in public, innit.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:06 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Paul1965 wrote:
hifidelity2 wrote:
Instead of putting them through the costs of the courts bring back the stocks – I’m sure 30 min of being jeered at / pelted with rotten fruit would make them think twice


I've thought for a long time that bringing back the stocks would be a great idea. People will put up with a lot, but not being humiliated in public, innit.

Unfortunately it might be illegal. Humiliating or degrading punishment.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:12 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 5 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.