View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 6:50 am
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
PC not Registering all Installed RAM
Author |
Message |
timark_uk
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm Posts: 12143 Location: Belfast
|
Lo peeps, first time posting in this forum so be gentle. (8+)
My work PC isn't registering all of it's installed RAM. I upgraded to 4GB the other day but it's only registering 3.25GB. Is this a limitation of WinXP, or is it something more than that? The machine I'm using is a Dell Optiplex GX 755 with an Intel vPro processor running at 2.66Ghz. Is there anything I can do to get the machine to recognise the full 4GB installed RAM?
Mark
|
Thu May 21, 2009 5:26 pm |
|
 |
monkeyphonix
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:31 pm Posts: 176
|
Its a limitation of 32 bit operating systems. I think that PC supports 8 maximum but you can only get over 3.2 or so with a 64bit operating system like Vista 64 which most people here seem to be using.
|
Thu May 21, 2009 6:02 pm |
|
 |
mars-bar-man
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:00 pm Posts: 940 Location: Pompy
|
Like monkey boy over me said, it's a problem with x86 Operating systems, they're limited to 3.25Gb of RAM, sucks eh? Only way you'll get the full 4Gb is to upgrade to an x64 OS, but x64 XP is (from what I've heard) shocking for driver support, Vista x64 is the only way for the full 4Gb, or Win7 x64 for that fact...
_________________Just your friendly neighbourhood mars-bar-man.flickr
|
Thu May 21, 2009 8:07 pm |
|
 |
stuartpengs
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:00 pm Posts: 300 Location: In the night garden.
|
|
Thu May 21, 2009 9:30 pm |
|
 |
EddArmitage
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 5288 Location: ln -s /London ~
|
Yuppo. 2^32 bit address buses are theoretically adequate for mapping 4GB of RAM (Just!), but that doesn't account for the system needing some addresses for other bits of the computer (RAM on a graphics card, various other little hidden bits here and there that you'll never see), so the sneaky computer uses the top chunk of addresses for these.
Edd
|
Fri May 22, 2009 8:34 am |
|
 |
John_Vella
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am Posts: 7935 Location: Manchester.
|
Wouldn't that mean it's the system taking the memory, not the Operating System?
Well... yes it would, because my Asus PCH-DL reports 3.something Gig in the BIOS despite having 4 Gig installed.
_________________John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker  Sorry  I'll behave now. Promise 
|
Fri May 22, 2009 11:45 am |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|