Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Ghostly Goings On 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
I took a trip to the graveyard when it snowed with the intention of trying out some Kodak T-Max 400 in the Vivi. I took the whole film and sent it away on Monday. It came back on Friday and all scans came back fine.

Apart from one.

Now I dont believe in ghosts or angels or anything else. I am a compete cynic when it comes to such things. I've had a look at the photo though and when I condiser 1) that all other photos are fine; 2) it's not lens flare as I'm not facing away or into the sun; 3) this isnt a frame from the beginning or end of the film, then it raised my eyebrow a little.

I'm sure someone will give a proper explanation, like something happened during deveopling or scanning for this one frame, but you can make your own mind up.






Image

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:12 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Ossome!

I have nothing to offer sadly. It is what it is. :)
Swamp gas, reflected off a weather balloon, because of Venus close to the horizon or something. Yeah.

EDIT:

Do you have the rest frames either side of this one uploaded anywhere? Any chance of getting the three frames scanned entirely, sprocket holes n all?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:22 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Dodgy bit of film? Processing f**k up? Double exposure?

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:45 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Dodgy bit of film? Processing f**k up? Double exposure?


I can rule out double exposure. Dodgy film is possible but unlikely as all other pics from same film are fine. Processing f**k up quite possible but again all other frames are fine.

Full set on Flickr here

Image
03 by phil_veater, on Flickr

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:54 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
Image
03 by phil_veater, on Flickr


Love that one. Very, very nice.

Also - who did you use for processing?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:15 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
That. Is a most awesome photo. *like*

As for the first photo, it's clearly, finally, unarguable proof of eternal life after death and the ability of our spiritual forms to affect light-sensitive chemicals situated within the physical realm in a blurry, indefinable way! *ghost noises*.


Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:24 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Someone has suggested to me that you may have actually photographed an exhale. That right there might just be condensing breath. YMMV.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:32 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Someone has suggested to me that you may have actually photographed an exhale. That right there might just be condensing breath. YMMV.


That's what I would have mentioned.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Dec 05, 2010 7:26 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Also - who did you use for processing?


http://PhotoFilmProcessing.co.uk/

It was £10 for b&w processing, scans to CD (upgraded to higher res scans) and free return delivery. Turn around was 4 days.

You can have prints done and that includes free CD scans.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sun Dec 05, 2010 7:28 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Someone has suggested to me that you may have actually photographed an exhale. That right there might just be condensing breath. YMMV.


That's a good explanation given the temperature on the day

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sun Dec 05, 2010 7:29 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
I think it's just down to the weather mate. The same thing happened on one of my photos the other night. Heat/cold air/moisture, that type of thing-a-me-bob.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:42 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
EDIT:

Do you have the rest frames either side of this one uploaded anywhere? Any chance of getting the three frames scanned entirely, sprocket holes n all?


Just noticed this edit. All frames have been posted in the Flickr set but I cannot scan the negs myself as I dont have a proper scanner.

This was the frame before

Image
12 by phil_veater, on Flickr

This was the frame after

Image
11 by phil_veater, on Flickr

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:58 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 437
Location: Coalisland,N.Ireland
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
That. Is a most awesome photo. *like*



+1


yours wecrookie :shock:

_________________
Carpe Diem - Squeeze the day!


Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:54 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.