Reply to topic  [ 344 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 23  Next
James Cameron Says Sequels and "Battleship" are Ridiculous 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
What next a remake of the Godfather Trilogy? /s
That rumour's been circulating for a good few years now.
I can't see Hollywood not revisiting that series of films sometime soon.

Mark

With Shia LeBeouf? ;)

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:45 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
With Shia LeBeouf? ;)
Dunno, but why not?
Just because he's in those rubbish Transformers films doesn't make him a bad actor.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:53 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
okenobi wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
The woman in charge does seem to know what she's doing though.
Bollocks. I didn't comment because it's not just Whedon who's not interested....
Heh. Don't shoot the messenger.
I liked Buffy on TV. I'm pretty sure I've seen every single episode of the show, but I don't hold it in an ivory tower. While I like everything that Joss has done on TV his film work has left a lot to be desired, mainly I think because Hollywood works differently with films than it does with TV.
Joss isn't going to get the level of creativity with films like he had with TV.

Mark


I agree that the movie sucked balls and Joss' TV work is certainly of a better calibre. But he can still write and there are examples of that in a few good movies. Also, we've not seen Cap yet.

But what about that article makes you think that woman is doing anything but spouting the same stuff you and I know about that show as fans. I've seen every ep, I could've written that article. Does that make me a good replacement for Joss?

And all that aside, Buffy works better as serialised TV than as a movie. Joss INVENTED the concept of the "big bad" that has been replicated everywhere since 1997!


Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:17 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
But what about that article makes you think that woman is doing anything but spouting the same stuff you and I know about that show as fans. I've seen every ep, I could've written that article. Does that make me a good replacement for Joss?
Nothing.
I just said she seemed to know what she was talking about.
Unless there's real merit to the project I don't see it happening, mainly because of the still very strong fandom for the TV show and Joss in general.
If there is real merit to the proposed idea, Hollywood will have faith that the vocal fans against it will be won over by the end result.
One way it works, the other way it never happens. That's got to be the best outlook, no?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:32 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
And all that aside, Buffy works better as serialised TV than as a movie. Joss INVENTED the concept of the "big bad" that has been replicated everywhere since 1997!


I've not seen Buffy so can't relate specifically to what you are saying about "big bad", but wiki gives it the following description.

Quote:
Big bad is a term originally used by the Buffy the Vampire Slayer TV show to describe a major recurring adversary, usually the chief villain or antagonist in a particular broadcast season. It has since been used to describe annual villains in other television series.


Now I'm pretty sure there will be quite a few recurring adversaries, villians and antagonists in shows well before Buffy, so wouldn't it be more correct to say that he invented the term, and not the concept?

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:35 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
wouldn't it be more correct to say that he invented the term, and not the concept?
(8+D
I'm glad I kept my gob shut. Sometimes it's nice to not be alone in your observations and thoughts.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:45 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Now I'm pretty sure there will be quite a few recurring adversaries, villians and antagonists in shows well before Buffy, so wouldn't it be more correct to say that he invented the term, and not the concept?

If nothing else, is the concept of the 'Big bad' who must be overcome at the end by our hero actually any different to an end-of-level boss enemy in video games? We've had those since the mid-80's.

Jon


Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:16 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
There was A LOT less good serialised television before Buffy. Let alone a "one villian per season" concept. The implementation is what makes it different.

Oh and Hollywood doesn't understand faith - only money. If they think the IP has legs they'll make it. Irrespective of what original fans think. After all, the moviegoing public have the attention span of a goldfish and vampires are *in* right now.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:18 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
If nothing else, is the concept of the 'Big bad' who must be overcome at the end by our hero actually any different to an end-of-level boss enemy in video games? We've had those since the mid-80's.


You don't generally see the Big Boss throughout the game though.

okenobi wrote:
There was A LOT less good serialised television before Buffy. Let alone a "one villian per season" concept. The implementation is what makes it different.


A couple more questions.
So none of these Big Bads appeared outside of any one season?
Did they appear in every episode per season, and if not what was the story about if there were no other villains?


I should probably watch Buffy at some point. But, as I haven't seen Babylon 5 and a few seasons of SG Atlantis, and I prefer sci-fi to fantasy then it is someway down the list.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:56 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
There was A LOT less good serialised television before Buffy. Let alone a "one villian per season" concept. The implementation is what makes it different.
Matt just got me thinking about B5, and while I can't quite recall the term "big bad" being used in that show, it certainly had it's seasonal big bad to deal with.
Also, if I recall correctly, the entire five seasons had the same evil force being fought.
The Shadows weren't just a seasonal big bad, they were the big bad for the whole show.
Other that that, I'm finding it difficult to come up with any other examples.
Anyone else have any?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:07 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Other that that, I'm finding it difficult to come up with any other examples.
Anyone else have any?

Mark


Military Police characters in the A-Team.

Generally a different character per season, with a sidekick in most cases.

Q

Although present over several seasons, hence the question about Big Bads being season specific in a previous post.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:15 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Q, bad? Mischievous, certainly, but bad, I'm not so sure.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:17 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Q - Antagonist, yes, adversary, yes. :)

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:19 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Q - Antagonist, yes, adversary, yes. :)
Ha. That'll teach me.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:22 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Anyone else have any?

Mark


Defence rests, your honour.

B5 is often rolled out as THE template for serialised television and rightly so. It's a great show. But it's also an anomaly amongst it's chronological contemporaries for that very reason.

As for Q, he doesn't meet the definition IMO, because he wasn't always there at the finale and he didn't ALWAYS pose a threat to the various crews he encountered.

Matt, big bads appeared sporadically throughout each season of Buffy, but were not in each ep. One of the beauties of Buffy (which has since been replicated to varying degrees of success in a ton of shows) was the ability of the writers to balance arc/mythology eps (mostly, but not always featuring the big bad, or at least a significant reference to them) with character/standalone/musical/whatever eps. Buffy Summers struggled with her duty as a slayer and tried to balance it with wanting to be a normal teenage girl. The show was a macrocosm of this balance and to my recollection (outside of B5, go on Tim find something else, I dare you ;) ) the first show to do it successfully and in a format recognisable to today's TV audiences.

Did big bads exist across seasons - I can't remember 100%, but I don't think so. Spike, Angel etc. don't count. Perhaps the 1 person here with more televisual knowledge than me can answer that (;-)


Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:47 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 344 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 23  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.