Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
British lawmakers propose energy rationing 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Quote:
A group of MPs have suggested that the UK should introduce a system of energy rationing to deal with what they view as impending energy and climate crises.

Under the proposed system, a set number of tradeable energy quotas (TEQs) would be issued and used to purchase energy, whether through fuel or electricity.


http://blogs.ft.com/energy-source/2011/ ... rationing/

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:05 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
News just in...... MP's are morons!

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:19 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I agree with the basic principle but they have gone about it all in the wrong manner. What they need to do is completely alter the pricing system. Rather than energy getting cheaper the more you use it should be the other way around. So for low users it is actually cheaper than now. For Average users it is slightly more expensive less than 1% for heavier users it starts to get more expensive. basically the price increases the more you use not get cheaper. So for low usage the price is regulated and for larger usage the price per unit actually increases so no economies of wastage. Each year the usage allowance drops 0.5%. Over time this will cut domestic usage but at a rate that consumers can adjust to.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:39 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Rather than energy getting cheaper the more you use it should be the other way around.

Isn't that what's being suggested?
Quote:
The amount of energy being used would essentially be capped, and anyone wishing to use more than their personal allowance would have to pay a market rate for that.

I read about somewhere with a similar scheme already, but I'm damned if I can remember where :oops:

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:08 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Rather than energy getting cheaper the more you use it should be the other way around.

Isn't that what's being suggested?
Quote:
The amount of energy being used would essentially be capped, and anyone wishing to use more than their personal allowance would have to pay a market rate for that.

I read about somewhere with a similar scheme already, but I'm damned if I can remember where :oops:

Yes but having a ration slip like during the war and post war period is bureaucratic. Simply mandate the minimum prices for each level, and let the energy companies do the work.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:40 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
JJW009 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Rather than energy getting cheaper the more you use it should be the other way around.

Isn't that what's being suggested?
Quote:
The amount of energy being used would essentially be capped, and anyone wishing to use more than their personal allowance would have to pay a market rate for that.

I read about somewhere with a similar scheme already, but I'm damned if I can remember where :oops:

Yes but having a ration slip like during the war and post war period is bureaucratic. Simply mandate the minimum prices for each level, and let the energy companies do the work.


You will need some form of "Rationing slip" as a family will need more energy than a single person so each person would get a ration. Otherwise you would excessivly penalise families

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:47 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
You will need some form of "Rationing slip" as a family will need more energy than a single person so each person would get a ration. Otherwise you would excessivly penalise families

Not necessarily. Use a family of four as the basic unit. So if a average family used 1000 KWhrs then the rates for usage above that would be 10% higher. For usage twice that the rates would be still higher. If a single person was in a huge house they would have been penalised under a voucher system, but if they used more than a family they pay more. So for the first 1000 KWhrs energy is charged at 5p a unit at 20 higher usage it is charged at 10p per unit. And so on. Businesses would pay more but they can claim any investments to reduce usage against tax.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:01 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
For it to work, it has to be applied to the entire world. If it was just Europe for example, then it would push industries even more into Asia.

The stats are quite interesting, and not what you might expect:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... per_capita

I find the values frighteningly high. Here's a selection: :shock:

Qatar: 28495.1 Watts
USA: 10381.2 Watts
UK: 5218.2 Watts

Turkey: 1472.6 Watts
Bangladesh: 214.4 Watts

The median is about 2000 Watts, which would seem a fair cut-off point to only penalise countries with excessive consumption.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:25 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
For it to work, it has to be applied to the entire world. If it was just Europe for example, then it would push industries even more into Asia.

The stats are quite interesting, and not what you might expect:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... per_capita

I find the values frighteningly high. Here's a selection: :shock:

Qatar: 28495.1 Watts
USA: 10381.2 Watts
UK: 5218.2 Watts

Turkey: 1472.6 Watts
Bangladesh: 214.4 Watts

The median is about 2000 Watts, which would seem a fair cut-off point to only penalise countries with excessive consumption.

I like the idea of everyone having to cope with 2000 W per year. It would mean that those wasteful would get huge bills. Those who keep within the limits would find their electricity costs regulated with any increases being passed on those that use a lot.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Quote:
Qatar: 28495.1 Watts


Without looking I would guess that would be because of desalinisation. I think even air-con or heating running concurrently would be hard pressed to reach that figure.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Quote:
Qatar: 28495.1 Watts


Without looking I would guess that would be because of desalinisation. I think even air-con or heating running concurrently would be hard pressed to reach that figure.

Also because large parts of the admittedly small country have super-expensive, sup-luxurious hotels on them that must burn power like it's going out of fashion.

Plus they have (or plan to have) half a dozen fully air conditioned football stadiums by 2022. That may up the figure a smidgeon or two.

Jon


Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:12 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
belchingmatt wrote:
Quote:
Qatar: 28495.1 Watts


Without looking I would guess that would be because of desalinisation. I think even air-con or heating running concurrently would be hard pressed to reach that figure.

Also because large parts of the admittedly small country have super-expensive, sup-luxurious hotels on them that must burn power like it's going out of fashion.

Plus they have (or plan to have) half a dozen fully air conditioned football stadiums by 2022. That may up the figure a smidgeon or two.

Jon

I would imagine that it will go up considerably after the stadiums are built.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:22 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
According to Wiki, most of the power used in Qatar is down to air-con and desalination. It's made worse because water and electric are unmetered!!! so penalising heavy users would definitely cause civil war. :shock:

NB - that 2000W is an average figure. Watts is a unit of power, not energy. It's the equivalent of 1500Kg of oil per year, or very roughly 40 litres of petrol per week.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:11 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
or very roughly 40 litres of petrol per week.

Er.... that's what I put in my car anyway, regardless of all the energy I use in lighting, heating, powering gadgets etc.

Jon


Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:13 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
JJW009 wrote:
or very roughly 40 litres of petrol per week.

Er.... that's what I put in my car anyway, regardless of all the energy I use in lighting, heating, powering gadgets etc.

Jon

The average UK citizen uses 2.5x the world average amount of fuel. I imagine a lot of people on here would fall into that category.

Needless to say, the Yanks use 5x the average. That one country uses 25% of the planet's fossil fuels, despite only having 5% of the planet's population.

It's really not fair though, is it? It's like crashing a party, eating and drinking everything in sight and leaving half the people there to die. We're like a plague of locusts, and in just a couple of generations we will probably destroy everything we associate with "civilisation".

In effect, filling your car up is genocide.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:30 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.