Reply to topic  [ 326 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next
Anyone bought a tablet computer yet? 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
You know flash will be allowed on an iOS device over Jobs dead body. Anything that could take away from the razor wire walled garden and divert people away from filling the cash coffers even more will be actively discouraged.


Actually I don't hold with that point of view.

I believe Flash would be very welcome on the device if they could make it actually work well.

Adobe have failed miserably to make Flash run well on Apple hardware. It may or may not be their fault but the fact remains that it is buggy and a power hog.*

One day they may get it right (with sufficient incentive) then we all will benefit.

CC


* There may also be reasons why Apple don't want to tie into a proprietary technology (preferring open source). Apple have long liked open technologies. DRM was inflicted on them in iTunes by the record labels and was resisted for years before Jobs won that battle.

_________________
A Mac user Image


Sun Mar 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Flash is unnecessary. With HTML 5 why is it needed? It will just be a drain on the tablet what ever the system.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:06 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Flash is unnecessary. With HTML 5 why is it needed? It will just be a drain on the tablet what ever the system.


At the moment it would be nice to have it included. IF the bloody thing worked well. I have it on my Mac. Blocked most of the time because it slows everything down so much but there are times when I do want to watch Flash content.

I hope the more open HTML5 comes everywhere soon. If Flash is not available on portable devices (or it sucks batteries dry on devices like x-oom) then there will be strong incentive to develop competitors.

_________________
A Mac user Image


Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:46 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
ChurchCat wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Flash is unnecessary. With HTML 5 why is it needed? It will just be a drain on the tablet what ever the system.


At the moment it would be nice to have it included. IF the bloody thing worked well. I have it on my Mac. Blocked most of the time because it slows everything down so much but there are times when I do want to watch Flash content.

I hope the more open HTML5 comes everywhere soon. If Flash is not available on portable devices (or it sucks batteries dry on devices like x-oom) then there will be strong incentive to develop competitors.

I use click to flash as well. I block 99% of flash on any page unless it is essential. That said I would rather be shot of it completely. Most of my crashes and problems are because of it.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:34 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
ChurchCat wrote:
I hope the more open HTML5 comes everywhere soon.

I think for me it's not so much the fact that Flash is proprietary that grates with me, it's the fact that it's so inaccessible. This is less of an issue with components embedded in websites, but when whole sites are written in Flash (which is thankfully on the decline) text-based browsers (And Google) don't stand a chance. If Google doesn't know about it, then no matter how good the content I'm unlikely to be able to find it.

(And it's a power-hungry monster, but some things always will be)

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:35 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
ChurchCat wrote:
I hope the more open HTML5 comes everywhere soon.

I think for me it's not so much the fact that Flash is proprietary that grates with me, )


Oh, I agree. I don't care. I just want stuff to "just work". I don't mind paying a premium for stuff that "just works". By that I mean it works with minimum effort or inconvenience. So, easy to install (or better yet pre-installed), secure and easy to use are what I am looking for.

_________________
A Mac user Image


Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:43 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
ChurchCat wrote:
I hope the more open HTML5 comes everywhere soon.

I think for me it's not so much the fact that Flash is proprietary that grates with me, it's the fact that it's so inaccessible. This is less of an issue with components embedded in websites, but when whole sites are written in Flash (which is thankfully on the decline) text-based browsers (And Google) don't stand a chance. If Google doesn't know about it, then no matter how good the content I'm unlikely to be able to find it.

(And it's a power-hungry monster, but some things always will be)

I do not think that being proprietary is that much of an issue, don't forget Windows and OSX are also proprietary. Though they have not used that control well.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:20 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
What disturbs me about Flash is that it is probably the biggest and most widely distributed malware platform on the 'Net.

Flash has probably had more critical security flaws than OS X and Windows 7 combined last year! It is one of the reasons I'm happy with iOS and Windows Phone 7 not supporting Flash and why I have it disabled on my desktop machines.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Tue Mar 22, 2011 4:51 am
Profile ICQ
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Just seen a tweet from a vaguely reliable source...

Quote:
Here's full UK #iPad2 pricing info. Wi-fi: £399 - 16GB; £479 - 32GB; £559 - 64GB model. Wi-Fi + 3G: £499 - 16GB; £579 - 32GB; £659 - 64GB.


Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:42 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Just seen a tweet from a vaguely reliable source...

Quote:
Here's full UK #iPad2 pricing info. Wi-fi: £399 - 16GB; £479 - 32GB; £559 - 64GB model. Wi-Fi + 3G: £499 - 16GB; £579 - 32GB; £659 - 64GB.

Even slightly cheaper than I expected. I think I will get the 64Gb wifi version at those prices.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:12 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 1171
Reply with quote
forquare1 wrote:
Brilliant! :lol:

iPad 2 has Samsung fixated on "inadequate" aspects of new Galaxy Tab

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/201 ... ipad-2.ars

Fixed:
The Tab 10.1 has been redesigned since we saw it at MWC and both tablets can now boast that they are the world's thinnest tablets at 8.6 mm.
Ipad2 is not only thicker by 0.2mm but also heavier by 6g with the Galaxy weighing in at 595g.
The Tab 10.1 will cost the same as Ipad2 (in USA)

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/new ... z1HMHKrCfP

_________________
Image
Free Sim with £5 credit


Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:31 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
koli wrote:
Ipad2 is not only thicker by 0.2mm but also heavier by 6g

Neither of which are at all perceptible without a well-calibrated set of scales and a micrometer.

They still don't get it. They're still fixating around numbers when the last five years of techery has shown the mass of the tech buying population couldn't give a flying rat's ass about numbers. The iPod, iPhone and iPad have pretty much always been 'outnumbered' by their contemporaries but have outsold each one of them. People don't read specs, only geeks do. And geeks are a small portion of the market.

Sadly, I think Samsung may have already blown their chance. Whatever they do with it now, to the majority it will still be 'the galaxy tab' that they didn't buy last time because it didn't live up to the hype. Therefore, they won't buy it this time either. You only get once chance to make an impression and, frankly, Samsung blew it. As did Motorola. Someone will make a wildly successful Android tablet but somehow, I doubt it will be either of these two.

Jon


Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:06 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 1171
Reply with quote
One can still rely on jonbwfc to slagg off anything and everything and throw a 5000 words essay to boot... :roll:

Jon, is there anything in this world that is good enough for you?

_________________
Image
Free Sim with £5 credit


Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:15 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
koli wrote:
Ipad2 is not only thicker by 0.2mm but also heavier by 6g

Neither of which are at all perceptible without a well-calibrated set of scales and a micrometer.

They still don't get it. They're still fixating around numbers when the last five years of techery has shown the mass of the tech buying population couldn't give a flying rat's ass about numbers.Jon


Apple do though. When the iPhone4 came out they said this:

When creating iPhone 4, Apple designers and engineers didn’t start with a clean sheet of paper. They started with three years of experience designing and building the phones that redefined what a phone can do. iPhone 4 is the result of everything they’ve learned so far. And it’s all contained in a beautiful enclosure a mere 9.3 millimeters thin, making iPhone 4 the world’s thinnest smartphone.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:16 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Quote:
When creating iPhone 4, Apple designers and engineers didn’t start with a clean sheet of paper. They started with three years of experience designing and building the phones that redefined what a phone can do. iPhone 4 is the result of everything they’ve learned so far. And it’s all contained in a beautiful enclosure a mere 9.3 millimeters thin, making iPhone 4 the world’s thinnest smartphone.

People didn't buy the iPhone 4 because it was thin.

Jon


Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:41 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 326 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.