Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Thorium reactors anyone? 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comm ... orium.html

Fascinating read.

Now if only the coalition could have a long term view and invest in this project.

_________________
Image


Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:01 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
We've been talking about this in the Japan thread.

It's been known about for decades, if only they'd get off their arses and do something.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:51 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Actually if we scrapped Trident it would eliminate our need for the current technologies as we would not need to generate any plutonium waste. In fact it could be used to eliminate existing stocks of plutonium.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:01 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Actually if we scrapped Trident it would eliminate our need for the current technologies as we would not need to generate any plutonium waste. In fact it could be used to eliminate existing stocks of plutonium.

It strikes me that, given the US and Russia have reduced their stocks of nuclear warheads significantly, there must actually be a surplus of weapons-grade plutonium in the world, given it has a half-life of roughly 100 years. I assume what's spare is under heavy guard to make sure crazy people don't get their hands on it. There should be no reason at all for plutonium production to be a factor in the next generation of nuclear power stations.

Jon


Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:10 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
When you consider that Cornwall has thorium we could end up being energy independent for another century. A great outcome.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:30 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
Sounds a little too good to be true. I'd love to believe this would work and is something I'd fund if in power. As for public outcry, well it's not as if the Govt listen anyway.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:25 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
Sounds a little too good to be true.


I don't think so - I think the nuclear industry has business to protect, and the original research was done with weapons in mind as much as abundant power generation. For that very simple reason, it was passed over in favour of the more easily weaponised elements.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:16 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
Sounds a little too good to be true. I'd love to believe this would work and is something I'd fund if in power. As for public outcry, well it's not as if the Govt listen anyway.

I am not anti nuclear, I am more concerned with public safety. If that is done properly then I would think that we should go ahead, and ignore any vested interests. Also if we as a nation are first to solve any problems we get a new export opportunity which will help get us out of the mess we are in as a nation.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:55 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Also if we as a nation are first to solve any problems we get a new export opportunity which will help get us out of the mess we are in as a nation.


What a beautiful picture you paint.

What a shame it's never going to happen. Too many vested interests, too much control from the military-industrial-academic complex. I doubt we are ever going to see any British politician ever put country before selling their (and our) souls for the new world order.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:00 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Also if we as a nation are first to solve any problems we get a new export opportunity which will help get us out of the mess we are in as a nation.


What a beautiful picture you paint.

What a shame it's never going to happen. Too many vested interests, too much control from the military-industrial-academic complex. I doubt we are ever going to see any British politician ever put country before selling their (and our) souls for the new world order.

Well if they still need to produce plutonium they can still build the odd fast breeder reactor on some military base, also it does not mean that the existing nuclear plants are obsolete. They can still operate but with their plutonium being destroyed in thorium reactors solving the waste problem. Also since existing plants will need to be decommissioned they will need to earn the funds to pay for that decommissioning. So why not get the thorium reactors to pay as well effectively subsidising the old plants?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:31 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
I tweeted this article to someone last night, and I've seen it being bounced around the twitterverse all day, including a very optimistic tweet to Barack Obama. :lol:

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:00 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
JohnSheridan wrote:
Now if only the coalition could have a long term view and invest in this project.

As I understand it the Chinese are planning to invest in Thorium reactors. We could buy a few off them.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:49 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
As I understand it the Chinese are planning to invest in Thorium reactors. We could buy a few off them.

It does say that on Wiki.

I bet they'd be cheaper than we could build, and probably more reliable. The instruction manual might be hard to understand though.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu Mar 24, 2011 1:23 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
As I understand it the Chinese are planning to invest in Thorium reactors. We could buy a few off them.

You can rely on the Chinese as a Nation to plan long term, that's one of the things I've admired about them. I may have to dig about for info on the prototype pebble bed nuclear reactor they've built.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:03 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
The media is so focused on Libya that I didn't even hear of these until today.

Oldbury, Bristol.

Pickering, Canada.

Quote:
"People are concerned about nuclear power, but this particular incident is normal water with a bit of radiation. It is well below our regulatory and other limits," OPG's Ted Gruetzner told CTV News Channel Wednesday afternoon.

In a statement, the OPG said the leak will have no impact on the quality of drinking water and poses no risk to human health.

Environment Canada and the CNSC are monitoring the situation.

Demineralized water is water completely free of dissolved minerals and not heavy water, which is used to moderate a nuclear reaction.

John Luxat, a radiation expert with McMaster University, says demineralized water is essentially distilled water used to feed steam generators.

"It is not radioactive; it is not going through the reactors. It is actually just going through steam generators to produce steam to drive the turbines," Luxat told CTV News Channel.


Bit of a contradiction there.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:02 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.