Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Royal succession reform is being discussed 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Royal succession reform is being discussed, Clegg says

Quote:
Mr Clegg, who is responsible for constitutional reform, told the BBC the issue would "require careful thought".

But he said both he and David Cameron were "sympathetic" to changing rules which seemed "a little old fashioned".


Old fashioned! So what about hereditary positions to begin with?

We need a referendum on this, preferably with an option for enforced sterilisation. :twisted:

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:49 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
The thought of Clegg dealing with what will be an international issue makes me laugh :lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:00 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Royal succession reform is being discussed, Clegg says

Quote:
Mr Clegg, who is responsible for constitutional reform, told the BBC the issue would "require careful thought".

But he said both he and David Cameron were "sympathetic" to changing rules which seemed "a little old fashioned".


Old fashioned! So what about hereditary positions to begin with?

We need a referendum on this, preferably with an option for enforced sterilisation. :twisted:

As long as the sterilisation is mandatory to members of the Tory Party. :evil:

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:51 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
The only change that needs makeing legally is that sucession should be based on who was born first, not which male was born first.
ie If Will & Kate have a girl, then a boy, the girl should become queen.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:02 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
The only change that needs makeing legally is that sucession should be based on who was born first, not which male was born first.
ie If Will & Kate have a girn, then a boy, the girl should become queen.

This was the only issue last time. It can be done quite easily.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:07 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
The only change that needs makeing legally is that sucession should be based on who was born first, not which male was born first.
ie If Will & Kate have a girn, then a boy, the girl should become queen.

This was the only issue last time. It can be done quite easily.

Apparently not that easily. The English King/Queen is head of state of a lot of countries. Some of those countries have issues with that sort of constitutional change.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:15 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
The only change that needs makeing legally is that sucession should be based on who was born first, not which male was born first.
ie If Will & Kate have a girn, then a boy, the girl should become queen.

This was the only issue last time. It can be done quite easily.


What about the Catholics? Aren't we discriminating on religious grounds too?

Just get rid of the bloody lot.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:54 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
i would sooner have a Royal Family then a President
just look at the saga in Russia

the PM becomes President who then decides which lackey will be PM
no thanks, i just don't wish to see another layer of politicians, sooner the Royal Family by a long chalk ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:49 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
i would sooner have a Royal Family then a President
just look at the saga in Russia

the PM becomes President who then decides which lackey will be PM
no thanks, i just don't wish to see another layer of politicians, sooner the Royal Family by a long chalk ...

Yes the thought of President Blair or Cameron would be appalling.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:58 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Do we really need a head of state at all though? Are there any ceremonial or processional roles that couldn't be performed by a suitable people's representative.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:01 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
MrStevenRogers wrote:
i would sooner have a Royal Family then a President
just look at the saga in Russia

the PM becomes President who then decides which lackey will be PM
no thanks, i just don't wish to see another layer of politicians, sooner the Royal Family by a long chalk ...

Yes the thought of President Blair or Cameron would be appalling.

You don't think we're there already? They are presidents in all but name, and we've had presidentially aspirational PMs since, and including, Thatcher. I fail to see how we would be anyway disadvantaged politically if we didn't have a monarch.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:02 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
Quote:
My own personal view is that in this day and age the idea that only a man should ascend to the throne I think would strike most people as a little old-fashioned.


We have a Queen.


My own personal view is that in this day and age, I think I'd probably prefer a a Monarchy state over the farce that we have now.

The Queen should enforce her powers, shoot the PM and disband Parliament. She can then return Britain to the formidable state it once was.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:04 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
No what we should do is give the Queen the nuclear button. Not that toff Cameron. :D

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:42 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
We have a Queen.


Only because she didn't have a brother.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:34 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
i would sooner have a Royal Family then a President
.

+1
Who'd want a lying bastard manipulative politician as head of state? The queen has always been politically neutral. Probably why she's much more popular than Charlie, who's always sticking his nose in things.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:11 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.