Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Police in urgent bail case review 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Quote:
Police in urgent bail case review

Police are urgently reviewing the cases of thousands of suspects after a court ruling restricted their powers to hold or bail them for further questioning.

The ruling - in a case involving Greater Manchester Police - means that suspects can be released on police bail for no more than 96 hours (four days).

At present, suspects can be released on bail pending further inquires for weeks, or even months, in some cases.

Home Secretary Theresa May said it was a matter of "great concern".

Mrs May said the Home Office was considering whether to appeal against the ruling or introduce emergency legislation.

The fresh guidance to police custody officers followed a ruling by Mr Justice McCombe in the High Court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13957873

I think the courts have got this right TBH. I'll have to have a dig in my books for the research, but it's been shown before that the longer the Police have to investigate a case, the longer they will take. I'm not suggesting they're necessarily lazy, but the evidence is there to show that shorter timescales lead to speedier investigations and charges being brought.

If the Police don't have enough to charge someone, then I don't see why anyone should have any restrictions placed upon them, until such time that the Police can bring charges.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:48 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Witnesses are far better in the first couple of days as well so it could be a good thing.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:51 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Would just like to address this while I'm at it:

Quote:
The guidance says officers will have to re-arrest suspects in order to detain or question them again, but that this will require them to have "new evidence".


Oh come off it! Re-arresting someone is hardly difficult. As for "requiring new evidence" - if you didn't have enough to charge them in the first place, then odds are you'll have new evidence when you re-arrest them because you'll have managed to piece a case together. :roll:

I really don't see why the Police should be able to place restrictions on a person's liberty in the longer term, it's extrajudicial punishment IMO - especially if the Police 'NFA' the case further down the line.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:55 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
I think the courts have got this right TBH. I'll have to have a dig in my books for the research, but it's been shown before that the longer the Police have to investigate a case, the longer they will take. I'm not suggesting they're necessarily lazy, but the evidence is there to show that shorter timescales lead to speedier investigations and charges being brought.

If the Police don't have enough to charge someone, then I don't see why anyone should have any restrictions placed upon them, until such time that the Police can bring charges.

They can hold them for a few hours release them on bail and then charge them later, even after they get more evidence. You do not even have to arrest them again. You release them on police bail tell them to report at the police station at a future date and then when they come in announce whether they will be charged or the case is being dropped. No need for emergency legislation.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Last edited by Amnesia10 on Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:05 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
emoergency

Emoergency? Is that when depressive teenagers run out of things to be miserable about? ;)

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:35 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
adidan wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
emoergency

Emoergency? Is that when depressive teenagers run out of things to be miserable about? ;)

Typo but even emos need love. :lol:

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:45 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.