Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
US Navy Bought Fake Chinese Microchips With Backdoor 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Oops.

Quote:
The Navy Bought Fake Chinese Microchips That Could Have Disarmed U.S. Missiles
Robert Johnson
Jun. 27, 2011, 9:22

Last year, the U.S. Navy bought 59,000 microchips for use in everything from missiles to transponders and all of them turned out to be counterfeits from China.
Wired reports the chips weren't only low-quality fakes, they had been made with a "back-door" and could have been remotely shut down at any time.
If left undiscovered the result could have rendered useless U.S. missiles and killed the signal from aircraft that tells everyone whether it's friend or foe.
Apparently foreign chip makers are often better at making cheap microchips and U.S. defense contractors are loathe to pass up the better deal.
The problem remains with these "trojan-horse" circuits that can be built into the chip and are almost impossible to detect -- especially without the original plans to compare them to.
The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency (IARPA) is now looking for ways to check the chips to make sure they haven't been hacked in the production process.
Expect to see a whole lot more funding directed to this goal. Or, considering IARPA is the research and development section of the intelligence community -- expect the money to be spent -- don't expect to see where.


http://www.businessinsider.com/navy-chinese-microchips-weapons-could-have-been-shut-off-2011-6

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:33 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 1171
Reply with quote
businessinsider wrote:
Wired reports they had been made with a "back-door" and could have been remotely shut down at any time.

wired wrote:
The chips turned out to be counterfeits from China, but it could have been even worse. The chips could have been hacked, able to shut off a missile in the event of war or lie around just waiting to malfunction.

Looking at the conclusion that business insider got from what wired wrote I think they misunderstood.
I don't think the back-door was actually there. I think wired meant that "had there been a back-door" the chips "could have been hacked".

I ready to be corrected though, English is my second language after all...

_________________
Image
Free Sim with £5 credit


Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:15 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
koli wrote:
I think they misunderstood.

I think you're right.

It looks unambiguous to me. "could have been" not "had been". That's very bad copy-paste journalism basically creating a sensationalist story where there wasn't one. At least they quoted their source so the more diligent could check.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:47 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
I'm thinking that a chip in a missile would need a lot more than just an undocumented back door to get hacked. Like some kind of way to access it for instance.


Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:08 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
I'm thinking that a chip in a missile would need a lot more than just an undocumented back door to get hacked. Like some kind of way to access it for instance.

It doesn't have to be "hacked". One possibility mentioned was simply premature failure. Missiles don't usually get used the day they're assembled, and depending on the chip it could be designed to fail in certain situations.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:25 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
ShockWaffle wrote:
I'm thinking that a chip in a missile would need a lot more than just an undocumented back door to get hacked. Like some kind of way to access it for instance.

It doesn't have to be "hacked". One possibility mentioned was simply premature failure. Missiles don't usually get used the day they're assembled, and depending on the chip it could be designed to fail in certain situations.

Maybe there will be a hidden code that if aimed at a chinese military vehicle that it detonates immediately rather than be allowed to fire. Also ballistoc missiles will treat any GPS position in China as non existant so will not detonate. :twisted:

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:27 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
They didn't buy any of these while they were at it did they?

Image

clicky lager photos @ clicky

Genius.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:27 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.