Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Labour seeks law change to stop News Corp renewing BSkyB bid 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/au ... -bskyb-bid

Quote:
Labour is trying to secure cross-party support for an emergency change in the law to prevent News Corporation from renewing its bid to take full ownership of BSkyB.

In a move designed to capitalise on the embarrassment the phone-hacking scandal has heaped on the government, Labour said there was still a possibility that Rupert Murdoch could reopen his bid and the law should be changed to allow ministers to block it. Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture secretary, will introduce a negative motion when parliament returns next week, which – if approved by all parties – could go ahead without a vote.

He has written to the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, and the Lib Dem culture spokesman, Don Foster, with his proposals. The aim would be to introduce a new public interest test applicable to media barons to rule people out based on their conduct.

Under Labour's proposed amendments to Section 58 of the Enterprise Act 2002, ministers would be given the necessary powers to ask regulators to apply a wide-ranging public interest test. Ministers would be also be able to intervene at any stage in the process if new information came to light.

I hope this succeeds.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:13 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Quote:
In a move designed to capitalise on the embarrassment the phone-hacking scandal has heaped on the government,

So the current government may have employed the wrong people and not responded very well to the issue, but didn't most of this occur under the previous government?

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:57 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Quote:
In a move designed to capitalise on the embarrassment the phone-hacking scandal has heaped on the government,

So the current government may have employed the wrong people and not responded very well to the issue, but didn't most of this occur under the previous government?

Yes but the police lied to the former government as well. Both parties were caught fiddling expenses. Cameron screwed up when he hired Coulson even when warned. Yet failed to ask the right questions that should have protected him and the government. All have issues with Murdoch.


---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=50.803958,-0.058436
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:46 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
OMG! :o I actually support a Labour policy. :?

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:48 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
OMG! :o I actually support a Labour policy. :?

You should always be willing to accept that any party can have sensible policies.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:19 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Other Labour policies I have agreed with:
Public Smoking Ban
Not joining the EURO. (Okay, that wasn't really a policy, they just delayed it until it was obvious that the Euro was a teaming turd, but I'm glad they didn't force us into it without asking.)
Giving the Bank of England (rather than a ploitician) interest rate control.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:49 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
im a smoker so i can not be a party to that/this or anything else as i am considered to be less then human

i hope all smokers are banned from voting (smokers are not allowed in public) that way i can smoke without having any say in governance
only non smokers (unless obese) can vote and have

awaiting the next ban ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:29 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
im a smoker so i can not be a party to that/this or anything else as i am considered to be less then human

i hope all smokers are banned from voting (smokers are not allowed in public) that way i can smoke without having any say in governance
only non smokers (unless obese) can vote and have

awaiting the next ban ...

I think that this government are already scapegoating those on benefits so as a smoker you will not be alone for long. Next they will target northerners. ;)

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:36 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
MrStevenRogers wrote:
im a smoker so i can not be a party to that/this or anything else as i am considered to be less then human

i hope all smokers are banned from voting (smokers are not allowed in public) that way i can smoke without having any say in governance
only non smokers (unless obese) can vote and have

awaiting the next ban ...

I think that this government are already scapegoating those on benefits so as a smoker you will not be alone for long. Next they will target northerners. ;)


I remember a comedy TV series where people were discriminated over height. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Small_Problem

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:30 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
im a smoker so i can not be a party to that/this or anything else as i am considered to be less then human

i hope all smokers are banned from voting (smokers are not allowed in public) that way i can smoke without having any say in governance
only non smokers (unless obese) can vote and have

awaiting the next ban ...

If the next ban is for drama queens you need to buy a shack in the Hebrides (outer) :p


Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:56 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
MrStevenRogers wrote:
im a smoker so i can not be a party to that/this or anything else as i am considered to be less then human

i hope all smokers are banned from voting (smokers are not allowed in public) that way i can smoke without having any say in governance
only non smokers (unless obese) can vote and have

awaiting the next ban ...

If the next ban is for drama queens you need to buy a shack in the Hebrides (outer) :p


already got one and a shack ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:09 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.