Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Human Body Might Adapt to Radiation Exposure 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Quote:
Human Body Might Adapt to Radiation Exposure
Rachael Rettner, Date: 24 August 2011 Time: 09:27 AM ET

Doctors who are regularly exposed to X-ray radiation may undergo changes in their cells that protect them from the radiation they encounter, a new study suggests.

These physicians have higher levels of a particular antioxidant called glutathione inside their red blood cells than physicians who don't use X-rays regularly, the study showed. In addition, some of these cells may be better able to self-destruct, which would be protective if they turned cancerous.

However, it's still not clear whether these changes will be beneficial in the long run, or reduce the physicians' cancer risk, said study researcher Dr. Gian Luigi Russo, a senior research scientist at the National Research Council (CNR) in Pisa, Italy. Instead, these alterations might be early indicators of a disease, Russo said.

In the meantime, doctors who frequently work around X-rays should take every precaution to reduce their risk of radiation exposure, the researchers said.

Adaptation to radiation

Interventional cardiologists are doctors who perform minimally invasive operations on the heart, and use X-rays to guide them. While the patients of these procedures receive the highest dose of X-ray exposure, the doctor encounters radiation that scatters off the patient and the walls.

The dose during a single operation is low, but it all adds up, the researchers said. Over a year, an interventional cardiologist may be exposed to the equivalent of 250 chest X-rays.

"After 30 years of work, this corresponds to a lifetime's increased risk of developing cancer of approximately 1 in 100, although there is still some uncertainty in these risk estimates," the researchers said.

Russo and colleagues analyzed blood samples from 10 interventional cardiologists and 10 laboratory hospital workers who were not exposed to radiation as part of their jobs.

On average, the interventional cardiologists were exposed to 4 millisievert (mSv) of ionizing radiation per year, those some exposures were as high as 8 mSv. The average person in the United States is exposed to about 3 mSvs per year from natural sources, according to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The researchers concluded these doctors may be adapting to their higher radiation exposure based on their levels of molecules called reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS molecules can damage DNA if they get inside cells.

The interventional cardiologists had higher levels of ROS in the plasma surrounding their blood cells than the other doctors, however, inside their red blood cells, both groups had the about the same levels of ROS.

That means that the cardiologists cells were producing more glutathione, and protecting the cardiologists' cells from seeing their ROS levels spike, Russo told MyHealthNewsDaily.

Additional studies

The study is "extremely interesting," and shows the body has a way of changing to limit the negative side effects of radiation, said Dr. Michael Samuels, a radiation oncologist at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, who was not involved with the study. "At least on a theoretical basis, this is a mechanism that prevents radiation from harming those cells," Samuels said.

However, additional studies are needed using larger groups of people to determine the long-term effects of this type of radiation exposure, the researchers say. Wearing appropriate shielding material, including lead aprons, and reducing the radiation dose the patient receives during these operations, may let doctors reduce their radiation exposure, Samuels said.

The study is published online today (Aug. 23) in European Heart Journal.

Pass it on: It's possible exposure to chronic low doses of radiation may prompt beneficial adaptations in cells, but more research is needed to confirm this.


http://www.livescience.com/15723-doctors-exposed-radiation-adapt.html

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:05 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
All I want to know is how do I get super powers? ;) :lol:

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:07 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
Is Cloaked_Wolf one of these radioactive cardiologists? We can ask him to bite you. I don't know what powers will transfer to you through this process - but I suggest avoiding radioactive proctologists at all costs.


Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:02 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Is 10 a statistically significant sample? Interesting if it's true because I was having a conversation about "evolved for life in space" re. radiation tolerance just last weekend, and I argued that it wasn't genetically possible to "evolve" in one's own lifetime!

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:56 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Is 10 a statistically significant sample?

Compared to any significant population? No.

Jon


Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:59 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Is 10 a statistically significant sample? Interesting if it's true because I was having a conversation about "evolved for life in space" re. radiation tolerance just last weekend, and I argued that it wasn't genetically possible to "evolve" in one's own lifetime!


Evolve no, respond yes. We could live underground for generations and still be able to get a tan on emergence.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:09 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
Is Cloaked_Wolf one of these radioactive cardiologists? We can ask him to bite you. I don't know what powers will transfer to you through this process - but I suggest avoiding radioactive proctologists at all costs.

I was hoping more for spider powers or something like that rather than the ability to have a glowing bottom. :lol:

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:36 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Surely a better group of people to study would be the ones who live near Chernobyl.
Any adaptation to a higher radiation background would surely be a generational thing. The children of people living in a high radiation background should be better at dealing with the radiation (assuming they survive) than their parents and so on. For that to work though, the less adaptable would have to be unable to pass on their genes and we don't really go in for that sort of thing these days.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:08 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
Not radioactive and (hopefully) not sterile. Have worked in Orthopaedics and in Interventional Cardiology where there is X-ray exposure but you're meant to wear lead-lined aprons (cover front and back from neck to knees, but misses the sides!) and a lead-line neck shield (wrap around; protects thyroid).

Mutations can occur and evolution depends on which level you're looking at. At the cellular level, yes. In terms of the whole human, no obvious physical manifestations.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:05 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.