Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
US College Sued For Fraud 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Quote:
The Art Institutes: Legitimate Photo Schools or Accessories to Fraud?

August 30, 2011
by David Walker


A lawsuit against the nation's second largest operator of for-profit colleges has cast a spotlight on the company's recruitment practices and ethics, including those of a chain called The Art Institutes, which offers degree programs in photography and more than 55 other creative fields at more than 45 locations around the country.

Earlier this month, the US Department of Justice sued Pittsburgh-based Education Management Corporation, which is 41 percent owned by investment bank Goldman Sachs. The government has charged the company with fraudulently collecting $11 billion dollars in state and federal student financial aid between July of 2003 to June of 2011. EDMC allegedly collected $2.2 billion of that money in 2010 alone. That amounted to almost 90 percent of the company's 2010 revenues.

The government says EDMC violated federal rules against paying recruiters based on the number of students enrolled. Those rules are designed to prevent colleges from recruiting unqualified students just to collect student aid money.

EDMC operates more than 100 schools under the names Art Institute, Brown Mackie College, South University, and Argosy University. According to former recruiters and photography students contacted by PDN, many Art Institute graduates leave with tens of thousands of dollars in student loan debt, and insufficient professional qualifications or job prospects to pay the money back.

Taxpayers are on the hook for the loans that students cannot repay.

EDMC has denied the government's claims. Jacqueline Muller, EDMC's VP of communications/public relations, told PDN in an e-mail, "We are proud of the success earned by many Art Institute alumni in all program areas, including photography." Art Institutes have some noteworthy graduates including Pulitzer Prize-winning photographers Carol Guzy (1980) and Martha Rial (1982).

But according to its critics, EDMC and AI's strategy has been to sell a dream of a lucrative career aggressively--and sometimes deceitfully--to low-income high school students who often lacked the skills and preparation to succeed in college, or the knowledge to explore less expensive educational options.

"They're preying on these [students]," says Suzanne Lawrence, a former recruiter for Argosy University who has turned government witness in the case against the company. "EDMC is not a public service organization. They're not trying to educate people. They're just trying to filter this government [student aid] money to their stockholders."

Muller says, "We offer a pathway to a higher education for many students who are not being served by traditional higher education." She also says that EDMC balances the interests of its students and shareholders. "The best way to meet investor expectations and success is to ensure that our students are successful," Muller says. "The two are not incongruent."

EDMC institutions have few admissions requirements beyond a high school diploma or GED. According to former recruiters who spoke to PDN, almost anyone--ready or not--can get in. "We were recruiting students who had no actual skills," Lawrence says. Muller says EDMC's schools are accredited and licensed by the states in which they operate, and that "interest and desire to attend our schools drives admissions, not demographics."

At the Art Institute of Pittsburgh campus alone, there were reportedly about 600 photography students pursuing a bachelor of arts or associates degree as of last summer, says Kathleen A. Bittel, the whistleblower whose testimony before a US Senate committee last fall helped trigger the federal lawsuit against EDMC. Bittel was a recruiter for Argosy University and then a career counselor for Art Institute's online division.

"Where are 600 photography graduates going to go? You cannot absorb that many in one city. How are they going to make money?" she says.

Bittel says EDMC had plans last summer to increase its photography student enrollment by adding a 12-15 month diploma to the program. The new degree was intended to attract students who wanted a "quick fix" in the form of a degree they could earn faster than an associate's degree with minimal effort, Bittel says. "If the bachelors students can't find jobs, where are the students with [12-month diplomas] going to go?"

EDMC focused recruiting efforts on low-income students not only to take advantage of their eligibility for government loans, but because they were "easy prey," says Bittel. "They don't know how the educational system works. They don't know if the deal they're getting is a good one or a bad one."

"If you didn't grow up with everyone in your family going to college, there's nobody to tell you, 'That's not a real school,' and there's nobody to tell you that you can take your grant money to another school," such as a community college or state school, says Lawrence.

Recruiters were under intense pressure to sign students up. According to Bittel, Lawrence, and Josef Bookert, who was a career services counselor at the Argosy University in Pittsburgh, recruiters were reprimanded and frequently fired for not meeting increasingly demanding enrollment goals, and managers made public examples of them to pressure other recruiters by fear and intimidation. "You got the numbers or you were out," Bittel says.

Bittel says pressure to enroll students increased after EDMC went public in 2009. The caliber of students declined as a result, Bittel says. "The quality of [graduate's] portfolios dropped, and then when the economy it was impossible" to place students in jobs related to their field of study after graduation.

"They would say whatever they had to, to get people in the door [to enroll]," says Bookert, the career counselor, who says he sat among recruiters and overheard their sales pitches. "The managers had culpability. They knew what was happening. I never heard anyone say, 'Lie to the students,' but I heard blatant lies every day."

For instance, recruiters told prospective students they would have no trouble getting high paying jobs in their field of study (whether photography or another program) upon graduating, and that they could easily pay back student loans. (Officially, Art Institute says more than 85 percent of its graduates get jobs within their field of study. Bittel and others say EDMC's method of counting is dishonest and the actual number is much lower. EDMC says on its web site that two investigations it conducted "found a lack of support for Bittel's claims that [EDMC] encouraged career services advisors to improperly report job placements.")

Bittel says that EDMC recruiters are more careful now about what they tell students because "they [management] realized they're being watched. But when I was there, recruiters were telling students all kinds of outrageous things, and that was being encouraged by administrators."

Recruiters also played on the emotional vulnerabilities of prospective students, according to Bittel and Lawrence. Lawrence says she and other recruiters were trained to "dig, dig, dig," for a prospect's so-called "confirmed [psychological] need," and then use it to pressure them to enroll. For instance, if a prospect said something like, "My DAD was never proud of me," the confirmed need was to make his or her father proud, explains Lawrence, who holds a master's degree in psychology. The recruiter was then supposed to try to reel in a wavering prospect by asking, "What about your father? Don't you want to make him proud?"

"I felt like I was using my skills for evil," says Lawrence, who holds a master's degree in psychology. "Those conversations basically turned into therapy sessions. They start to trust you, tell you about their problems, what's going on in their lives, and you use that to get them to enroll. It's very disingenuous."

Another part of the training was to gloss over the high cost of tuition, and the student loan debt that accrues. Bittel says recruiters were trained to tell prospective students the price per credit hour (about $500) and tell them that each class was three credits.

"We were told to let them do the math," she says, adding that they rarely did. "A lot of people saw the price per credit, thought that was the price per class, and didn't add it up."

Muller, the EDMC spokesperson, says total degree program costs is "easily available" on Art Institute's web site.

"You come in, someone at EDMC helps you get loans, and it feels like it's free until six months after you graduate," when the loan payments come due, says Bookert. "A big selling point is that you come to school and get educated, and worry about money later."

The reality hit as students approached graduation with huge debts, and few job prospects after all. "Students would get mad at me and say, 'What am I supposed to do with this degree?'" says Bookert. "[The cost] is very visible to [recent graduates] carrying $90,000 worth of debt they were supposed to start paying off."

"It was soul sucking," says Lawrence, who quit after six months to take another job. "You're really kind of ruining peoples' lives. There's no nicer way to put it."

Several former students interviewed for this story corroborated what former recruiters said about AI's recruiting methods. They also reported a lot of difficulty finding work as photographers and paying their debts.

Sarah Boger, of Austin, Texas, graduated from the Art Institute of Colorado in Denver with $105,000 worth of student loan debt. (One quarter of it was from Brooks Institute, a for-profit photo school not owned by EDMC that she attended prior to enrolling at Art Institute.)

Boger wanted a career in "live event and concert photography," and contacted the school after seeing its ads on TV, she says. "Ideally I wanted to work for Rolling Stone or Spin. They made it sound like if I went [to AI], they would help me find a job. They said 90 percent of their graduates are employed [with]in one year in their field. They said, 'We have contacts at all the major music magazines.'

"I think [the recruiter] was telling me what I wanted to hear, because when I got out, they didn't have anything," Boger says. An AI career counselor gave her just two contacts at small publications in Austin. Boger was unable to reach one because that contact had moved to another job, "and the other said to me, 'You don't have the qualifications you need,'" Boger recounts.

Eventually AI career counselors stopped returning Boger's calls for help, she says. Now she works as a tech support specialist for non-profit web sites--"nothing to do with my degree," she says. At one point she was trying to pay off her student loans by holding down three jobs. Now the loans are deferred, but Boger says she doesn't think she could pay them off even if she had a good job as a photographer. She's planning to pay off the debts instead with money she inherited from her mother, who recently died.

"I loved the teachers [at AI]," says Boger, "But the monetary value wasn't worth what I put in. The results are not going to happen as fast as they say. It's like they're pumping photographers out like little cookie cutters."

Another disillusioned graduate is Don Orkoskey of Pittsburgh. He got an associate's degree in photography from Art Institute of Pittsburgh in 2001 (which pre-dates the period covered by the federal lawsuit), then returned in 2003 for a degree in web design after deciding the photography degree wasn't getting him anywhere.

"I was young and stupid, and didn't understand that I could go to a traditional university and get the degree I wanted until I was in the thick of it," he says.

He now runs his own photography and web design business, but gives little credit to AI for his success. "The degree you get prepares you for an entry level position that you could get with no degree," he says, explaining that he eventually took courses at the University of Pittsburgh to learn the web design skills he needed to succeed.

He says, "I hate to get down on folks who get swept in because I was one of them. I spent five years in high school, smoking pot, looking for the easy way out, not willing to take things seriously or work hard.

"Art Institute sees those students, and latches onto them. They say, 'You'll be a photographer, or a graphic designer, or a chef." Orkoskey says he was receptive because he was hearing from everyone--his mother, his teachers, and politicians--that he'd be a failure without education.

The cost of attending AI didn't hit Orkoskey until after he graduated, and he was told he had to make loan payments amounting to $600 per month to pay off the debt. When he couldn't pay, lenders began pressing his mother--who had co-signed some of his loans--for the money. Orkoskey worked in data entry, retail inventory, and other jobs unrelated to photography for several years, before he got the education he needed to start his own business. But he's still paying off his AI debts, he says.

Others interviewed for this story had mixed views. They had enthusiastic praise for AI instructors, and credit the school with teaching them photography skills they believe will help them succeed. "You can see the people who are going to come out and have significant careers. Then there are those who are there because it's their only option," says Patrick Day, a mid career IT professional who attended Art Institute of Raleigh-Durham (North Carolina) because he lacked a college degree. "The school offered me the opportunity to get a degree while I'm still working;" nearby state and community colleges didn't, he says.

"I don't feel that they're a paper mill. The instructors all have master's degrees and experience in the industry. But it's ungodly expensive for what it is. If you look at a full bachelor's degree, it's in the neighborhood of 60 grand. If I went to North Carolina State, I could probably do it for a quarter of that."

Muller, the EDMC spokesperson, notes that career colleges including the Art Institutes "have long demonstrated success in their ability to meet the educational needs of the non-traditional student who has largely been ignored by traditional colleges and universities."

Photographer Brandon Werth, who graduated from Art Institute of Minneapolis in 2010, says his wedding and editorial business is going well. "I have to attribute a lot of my success to what I learned in school. I feel like they train you and help you get jobs."

Werth says he didn't do well in high school, and didn't realize art school was a college option until his step father mentioned the idea. He checked out the Minneapolis College of Art and Design, "but they have this pompous attitude toward art. I felt it was the wrong crowd for me to be with.

"It felt right at Art Institute," he continues. "My mom thought [the recruiters] were pushy. I could sense that. It was like one of those car salesmen deals....Yeah, there's a dark side. It seems like they didn't care who they brought in. They just wanted money."

But his instructors, he hastens to add, "Were the best thing that ever happened to me in terms of my life as an artist and my growth as a creative person." Students get out of it what they put in, he says.

Werth still has $80,000 in student loan debt. "I sometimes question whether it was worth it," he says. "Pulling myself out of debt to make a living is going to be a struggle but I'm just brushing it off."

His goal is to pay off the debt in about five years, and he's optimistic. "Business is going better than I thought it ever would."


http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/news/The-Art-Institutes--3531.shtml
Food for thought, perhaps, with some of the colleges set up here.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:52 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
The US student loan is considered another debt bubble waiting to burst. US student debts can never be written off in bankruptcy and they can be very large especially when college tuition has risen at twice the rate of inflation in the US for more than a decade. Banks love the system because when you miss a payment because you are too poor to pay they rack up huge fees.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:23 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
I think walking out with $100k + of debt from an education that isn't much use is pretty terrible, I know the UK system is bad but only those aiming for the highest earning jobs should even really bother even applying in the US

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:29 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
finlay666 wrote:
I think walking out with $100k + of debt from an education that isn't much use is pretty terrible, I know the UK system is bad but only those aiming for the highest earning jobs should even really bother even applying in the US

I do understand that, but unless you have a degree the pay is lower. And it is a big difference for most people. It has had a horrendous impact on Black and Latino students in the US.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:30 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
finlay666 wrote:
I think walking out with $100k + of debt from an education that isn't much use is pretty terrible, I know the UK system is bad but only those aiming for the highest earning jobs should even really bother even applying in the US

I do understand that, but unless you have a degree the pay is lower. And it is a big difference for most people. It has had a horrendous impact on Black and Latino students in the US.

How much more though? To offset over $100k it must be pretty fricking impressive in terms of pay difference

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Mon Sep 05, 2011 12:42 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
finlay666 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
finlay666 wrote:
I think walking out with $100k + of debt from an education that isn't much use is pretty terrible, I know the UK system is bad but only those aiming for the highest earning jobs should even really bother even applying in the US

I do understand that, but unless you have a degree the pay is lower. And it is a big difference for most people. It has had a horrendous impact on Black and Latino students in the US.

How much more though? To offset over $100k it must be pretty fricking impressive in terms of pay difference

It is in the thousands per year.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:14 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
It is in the thousands per year.


Assume a (generous) difference of 5k per year
After tax say it works out at 4k
That is 25 years

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:48 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
So by those numbers, the debt amoritses over 25 years and then for the rest of your career you make a tasty profit. Unless the degree gets you such an awesome job that you can retire at 50, in which case it's all rather moot.


Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:46 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
So by those numbers, the debt amoritses over 25 years and then for the rest of your career you make a tasty profit. Unless the degree gets you such an awesome job that you can retire at 50, in which case it's all rather moot.

Don't forget that US median wages have been stagnant for 40 years now so you are no better off. Your debts will be eroded at the same rate as your wages.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:56 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
So the moral of the story is that one needs to be an informed consumer. If you run up large debts taking on a worthless degree you will be [LIFTED] out of luck, if you run up double that earning a licence to print money, you should do ok.

Edit: Or should you? http://www.economist.com/node/21528226


Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:15 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
One of the features of the US system of student debt was that it enabled universities to increase fees without any thought because the rich could afford it and everyone else could get a loan. The demand from poorer people pushed up demand and so led to a bubble in education, funded by debt. Pretty much like the housing bubble. The problem in the US now is that they had sub prime education and that threatens the whole US education system. Initially it will be the newer private colleges that churned out crap degrees that will suffer but the reputations of the majority of universities will also be affected. The top few dozen universities will suffer very little. It will be the lesser colleges that start to suffer.

Personally I think that university education is overrated, unless it is for medicine, law and teaching. We need to go back to a fewer students under a fairer system with grants and free tuition to the brightest.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:47 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
I disagree. I think that more education is always a good thing (in terms of the greater good). The problem is that it's not necessarily a good financial investment for the individual, and the balance of risks and payments should reflect this.

Some level of tuition fee might be a good idea. The underlying thinking is that if you have to cough up your own money, you will be motivated to pursue a challenging and potentially rewarding course, whereas if you pay nothing, you might just go for something easy that offers more drinking time. I think we can all agree that challenging studies in rigorous fields are generally a good thing?

But with these 9 grand / year figures we have now, that goes too far (imo). The debt is scary and students need to feel assured that the degree is worth that much cash. I hate to think which degrees really stack up on that measure; but I imagine marketing does, and I suspect medieval literature doesn't. This is a shame, because I am perversely convinced that medieval lit and obscure branches of phonetics are better for our cultural health than business to consumer ad campaigns. So we end up with perverse incentives that undermine the original theory - some challenging degrees are hard to justify as investments, and some bull-poop ones are easier.

Tuition fees are supposed to serve a dual purpose - saving money on the one hand, and driving rational consumption on the other - they can only work if we lower them so that both objectives are served. If that still can't happen, they are not worth having, and we should accept that although expensive, education is a good thing that we will just have to spend government cash on. Much more of it. I see no reason why my plumber should be denied his wish to hold a bachelors degree in archaeology if he wants one.


Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:24 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I do support the idea of education for its own sake, so your plumbers Archeology degree is safe. Though the debts cannot be eliminate even in bankruptcy as in the US.

wiki wrote:
In the UK Student Loan entitlements are guaranteed, and are recovered using a means-tested system from the students future income. Student Loans in the UK can not be included in Bankruptcy, but do not affect a persons credit rating because the repayments are recovered from the students future salary at source by the employer before any income is paid, similar to Income Tax and National Insurance contributions. Many students however, are struggling with debt well after their courses have finished
The level of personal debt in the UK has also risen astonishingly in recent years:
"Total UK personal debt at the end of February 2008 stood at £1,421bn. The growth rate increased to 8.9% for the previous 12 months which equates to an increase of £111bn. [1


Excessive debt is what got nation to the problems it is in and not dealing with that is not going to help. By not allowing student debts to be written off is creating a tier of creditors above all others. What next? Mortgages that can never be written off? The fact that university education is now treated as the minimum for many jobs means that far more will be stuck in debts that are unpayable and that in the long run will mean that they have to pay debts over providing for pensions. All it does is push the problems on the next generation.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:02 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.