Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
.MPKG packages on the internet 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Short version : I have an .MPKG package I need to give people to download via the web (an IIS server to be specific). Obviously to every other OS .MPKG 'files' are in fact directories and so they appear as such when the URL is accessed on a Mac. Is there any way I can convince IIS to treat the MPKG bundle as a single file? I've tried MIME types and various other things, none of them seem to help at all.

Jon


Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:48 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5156
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
I'd probably look at zipping it, or putting it in a disk image, I think most Mac users would expect opening a DMG or zip file to install something.


Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:52 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Yes, if it's just for Macs to install, wrap it inside a disk image (.dmg) file.

_________________
* Steve *

* Witty statement goes here *


Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:17 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:34 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Belgium
Reply with quote
steve74 wrote:
Yes, if it's just for Macs to install, wrap it inside a disk image (.dmg) file.


Why not just zip it? Disk images are a very unsatisfactory way of delivering downloads, very unintuitive.

_________________
I’m on the internet — blog | flickr | facebook | twitter


Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:11 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5156
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
smithsocksimon wrote:
steve74 wrote:
Yes, if it's just for Macs to install, wrap it inside a disk image (.dmg) file.


Why not just zip it? Disk images are a very unsatisfactory way of delivering downloads, very unintuitive.


I would say that many Mac users know what to do with a disk image. It's not exactly unintuitive, maybe overkill?

Having said that, watching some ex-die-hard Windows users using a Mac, perhaps a zip file would be better.


Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:19 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
smithsocksimon wrote:
steve74 wrote:
Yes, if it's just for Macs to install, wrap it inside a disk image (.dmg) file.


Why not just zip it? Disk images are a very unsatisfactory way of delivering downloads, very unintuitive.


Ever downloaded a zipped disk image? Very silly.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:37 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5156
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
Does the default decompressor decompress bzip2 files? If you do choose to compress it I always find tar.bz2 files have much better compression.


Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:52 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:34 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Belgium
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
Ever downloaded a zipped disk image? Very silly.


I have, madness!

_________________
I’m on the internet — blog | flickr | facebook | twitter


Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:41 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.