Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Apple goes after Samsung Galaxy Nexus 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Copying your competitor is the done thing in Korea. Just have a look at Hyundai and Kia models compared to Toyota and Honda and you'll see striking similarities, and that is just with European models. Take a look at cars sold in Korea and they'll be even more similar as they don't have to worry about IP so much. It's been that way for a long time now, so it only makes sense that the attitude is going to spill out over other industries. Once you consider growth in China, who have the same attitude to IP, then it would seem that this type of infringement will only become more common in the future.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:12 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
JohnSheridan wrote:
Seems to me Apple only want to stop the competition :evil:

Personally, I think Samsung's strategy is flawed anyway. As long as they make phones that look iPhones and Apple keep coming after them, it's adding to the cost of Samsung doing business for I'm not sure what gain. Samsung should be looking at creating their own brand, not continually being accused of being (whether true or not) a copycat merchant.

When did Apple launch a phone without a physical button on it, for the home screen? I also don't see three virtual buttons for home, back and task list on my iPhone... :?

Or do you mean that the new iPhone 4S is made of cheap plastic? The one we have at work looks like glass and aluminium. But the materials look and feel so alike, I suppose it is an easy mistake to make.

I could understand the original Galaxy S, it did resemble the iPhone 3GS, but the Galaxy Nexus doesn't look anything like an iPhone (3GS or 4). And the physical screen size on the Galaxy Nexus is huge!

jonbwfc wrote:
Apple seem happy to let say Sony and RIM get on with it, because their phones don't look like iPhones but you can spot a BB or Experia if someone's holding them in the street.

It is the same with the Galaxy, slim and plasticy with big shiny "SAMSUNG" letters at the top of the screen, stands out against an iPhone!

jonbwfc wrote:
It's like.. car manufacturers have started to make parts their whole range of cars distinctively shaped, so in the street people can tell at a glance that a given car is one of theirs.

My girlfriend's Megane estate looks almost identical to the Corolla estate of the same year. Likewise, a new Opel Astra estate drove past us on Saturday and I had to do a double take, I thought it was an odd looking Golf Estate at first glance.

jonbwfc wrote:
IMO, Samsung should get into that game, rather than having to play continuous legal whack-a-mole with Apple. Regardless of the result of the law suits, it's costing Samsung as much to defend them as Apple to start them and Apple has more money than Samsung to throw at it (and continues to make more money than Samsung's mobile operation, so they're not going to run out of money first). In a war of attrition I don't see how Samsung can win.

The case, here in Germany, was that the Galaxy Tab looked "just like" an iPad, even though it was a different form factor, had "SAMSUNG" in big silver letters on the case, was made out of cheap plastic and, when turned on, had weather widgets and a clock on the home screen, which the iPad can't do... The whole case was around look-and-feel (no patents, as software patents aren't recognised here), and having played with both, I can say, that there is no chance of mistaking them. The iPad feels much "squarer" in the hand and the Tab, which feels cheap and plastic in the hand, it is much smoother to use than the iPad.

jonbwfc wrote:
As the saying goes, sometimes the best way to win the war is not to fight the battle.

Should Apple be so litigatious? Probably not. Should Samsung start trying to build their own brand identity? Absolutely. In the long term Samsung has much more to gain from that than trying to ape Apple and paying a continuous cost to do so. It's not as if designing a distinctive phone casing is beyond them.

Jon

Samsung seem to be going very much their own way, making cheap-plasticy feeling devices...

As to "slide to unlock", all Android devices have had that since 2007, so it seems a bit bogus to go after one specific manufacturer - apart from it being the latest, official Google Phone, as opposed to a re-branded and re-skinned version of Android (i.e. the phone has the vanlilla Android experience, not Samsung's TouchWiz).

That said, when the patent was announced back at the end of the summer, looking at the wording, the official Android, htc's Sense and Samsung's TouchWiz, or even Windows Phone 7, were infringing on the wording of the patent.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Jan 23, 2012 5:29 am
Profile ICQ
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
to sum it up
the bean counters now control Apple ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Mon Jan 23, 2012 11:30 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.