Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
US legal row over Dish Network's ad-skipping TV box 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
A legal row has erupted in the US over a set-top box that lets viewers skip over adverts in recorded TV shows.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18206803
Well as any PVR e.g. Humax will let you fly through the ads at 64 speed then I don't see much difference really. :?
Its the only way to watch TV IMHO :D

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Fri May 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 994
Reply with quote
Haven't watched TV in ages. iPlayer or other channels online with AdBlock Plus, although 4OD detects it and don't work. So you go and watch the shows on the 4OD channel on YouTube without the ads instead...

If ad-free options disappear, I will go without. Books, made from paper, FTW!


Fri May 25, 2012 8:36 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
I used to fast forward though the adverts on tv programmes I'd recorded on VHS (back in the day). I fail to see how doing this is any different.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat May 26, 2012 5:00 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
+1. IMO no different from videotaping a TV channel and skipping through the adverts.

These days, I just download TV shows. It's how I watched the new series of The Big Bang Theory before it aired on E4.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Sat May 26, 2012 10:23 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1899
Reply with quote
I think the main difference in their eyes is that the feature is being provided by a broadcaster rather than a company which makes receivers and doesn't do any broadcasting such as Humax.

_________________
Image

My Flickr Page

Now with added ball and chain.


Mon May 28, 2012 8:54 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
+1. IMO no different from videotaping a TV channel and skipping through the adverts.

Yeah, it's a bit odd. Do they think that people who record shows actually sit through the adverts?

cloaked_wolf wrote:
These days, I just download TV shows. It's how I watched the new series of The Big Bang Theory before it aired on E4.

I've been meaning to watch that, as people keep raving about it at work.

I'll pick up a box set, once I've finished wading through the SG-1 back catalogue. Four seasons down, six to go . ;)

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Mon May 28, 2012 9:31 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1899
Reply with quote
Spreadie wrote:

I'll pick up a box set, once I've finished wading through the SG-1 back catalogue. Four seasons down, six to go . ;)


The wife and I recently watched all 10 series of SG1. Took a couple of months. It's the one SciFi show she likes. 8-)

_________________
Image

My Flickr Page

Now with added ball and chain.


Mon May 28, 2012 10:20 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
From the article it looks like the networks argument is that, by deleting the adds completely from the broadcast Dish Network is altering the original material.
Skipping through the adds at 64x speed is different from them not having been present in the first place so up to that point I kind of see the argument the other networks are making.
Would I buy a box that automatically deleted the adds? Yes I would.

However, it's worth thinking about the alternative here. If easily defined and therefore removable add breaks become largely pointless the advertising will increasingly be done elsewhere - product placement for example. Personally I'd much rather have the add breaks that I can skip through than having stuff rammed into programs that can't be removed without getting the content (what little of that there is left these days) to prop up advertising revenues.

Viva la BBC!

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Mon May 28, 2012 12:01 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
Viva la BBC!


+1

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Mon May 28, 2012 12:29 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
From the article it looks like the networks argument is that, by deleting the adds completely from the broadcast Dish Network is altering the original material.
Skipping through the adds at 64x speed is different from them not having been present in the first place so up to that point I kind of see the argument the other networks are making.

Did you read the same article I did? From what I see, it skips over the adverts. It doesn't change or modify them. Just skips which I presume is like skipping a track on a music CD.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Mon May 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
davrosG5 wrote:
From the article it looks like the networks argument is that, by deleting the adds completely from the broadcast Dish Network is altering the original material.
Skipping through the adds at 64x speed is different from them not having been present in the first place so up to that point I kind of see the argument the other networks are making.

Did you read the same article I did? From what I see, it skips over the adverts. It doesn't change or modify them. Just skips which I presume is like skipping a track on a music CD.


There was a VHS deck that did that too - a lot of fuss was attempted to be created about it by broadcasters.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon May 28, 2012 1:42 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1899
Reply with quote
My Humax box has a function called Commercial Skip. It is customisable but its defaults are to jump forward 30 seconds and back 7 seconds which is great for when that last skip eats into the program.

_________________
Image

My Flickr Page

Now with added ball and chain.


Mon May 28, 2012 1:53 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
From the article it looks like the networks argument is that, by deleting the adds completely from the broadcast Dish Network is altering the original material.

So the machine could auto skip at x1000 speed for a fraction of a second every time the adverts came on and it would be all above board and legal.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon May 28, 2012 6:52 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
davrosG5 wrote:
From the article it looks like the networks argument is that, by deleting the adds completely from the broadcast Dish Network is altering the original material.
Skipping through the adds at 64x speed is different from them not having been present in the first place so up to that point I kind of see the argument the other networks are making.

Did you read the same article I did? From what I see, it skips over the adverts. It doesn't change or modify them. Just skips which I presume is like skipping a track on a music CD.


My understanding of the netowrks point of view from the article was that by having a feature that completely removed the ads from what the viewer sees the box is displaying an unauthorsied edit of the broadcasted (copyright) material. When I read it I assumed the box was actively deleting the ad breaks as it was recording. If it records the ads but just jumps over them then that's somewhat different although the effect on the presentation to the viewer is essentially the same (from the networks point of view).

l3v1ck wrote:
davrosG5 wrote:
From the article it looks like the networks argument is that, by deleting the adds completely from the broadcast Dish Network is altering the original material.

So the machine could auto skip at x1000 speed for a fraction of a second every time the adverts came on and it would be all above board and legal.


I believe that's the whole point of the various law suits that have been kicked off. If the box is skipping the ads at extremely high speed, such that the viewer see's nothing then it's effectively the same as deleting the ads at time of recording. In the past there was naff all the networks could do to prevent someone anal enough sitting watching a program with their finger poised over the pause button to remove the ads in the broadcast. Now that the process can essentially be automated they have a target to go after.

I never said I was in favour of the networks view point, just that I could understand their argument and that the consequences for broadcasting in general may be less desirable than some people think (e.g. an increase in gratuitous product placement).

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Tue May 29, 2012 12:13 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.