Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
'Ugly' cabinet dispute thwarts BT in Kensington and Chelsea 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18277561

They're definitely on the large side...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Thu May 31, 2012 11:44 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
They already have faster and more reliable speeds than a lot of people in rural locations. They should accept the design or go without.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:22 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5837
Reply with quote
Quote:
Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council blocked 96 out of 108 planned sites for new cabinets, saying they would ruin "our historic streetscape".

Two thoughts:

  1. Who got paid by whom?
  2. Kensington & Chelsea? I'm not being funny but it's hardly the bloody Hanging Gardens of Babylon, is it? Crawl out from up your own a*seholes, you status-worshipping pseuds.

_________________
Jim

Image


Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:49 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
  • Kensington & Chelsea? I'm not being funny but it's hardly the bloody Hanging Gardens of Babylon, is it? Crawl out from up your own a*seholes, you status-worshipping pseuds.


Ah, a proponent of the 'race to the bottom' are we?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:03 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5837
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
rustybucket wrote:
  • Kensington & Chelsea? I'm not being funny but it's hardly the bloody Hanging Gardens of Babylon, is it? Crawl out from up your own a*seholes, you status-worshipping pseuds.


Ah, a proponent of the 'race to the bottom' are we?

No - just not a proponent of the 'race up the bottom'.

;)

_________________
Jim

Image


Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:22 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Surely it's not beyond the wit of man to 'disguise' the cabs to make them more fit into the local environment? They don't have to be oblong grey blocks.

Jon


Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:25 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5837
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Surely it's not beyond the wit of man to 'disguise' the cabs to make them more fit into the local environment? They don't have to be oblong grey blocks.

I thought they were green

:?

_________________
Jim

Image


Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:39 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Surely it's not beyond the wit of man to 'disguise' the cabs to make them more fit into the local environment? They don't have to be oblong grey blocks.

Jon

If you do that for Kensington then you can do it everywhere else too. I don't see why Kensington should get preferential treatment.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:21 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
In 50 years time when BT want to take them away and replace them with a microscopic magic dot, there will be outrage that they've become a historic part of the local scenery and should be preserved.

Like the red phone box.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:32 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
In 50 years time when BT want to take them away and replace them with a microscopic magic dot, there will be outrage that they've become a historic part of the local scenery and should be preserved.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Probably.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:39 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
In Kensington & Chelsea each year there is an exhibition called Masterpiece. Basically the finest of everything on display and for sale. It is held in the grounds of the Royal Chelsea Hospital and consists of many large temporary buildings. Now by themselves the buildings are plain, modern and reasonably unobtrusive, except maybe perhaps for their size. The council will not grant a permit for the exhibition unless the buildings are made to look in character.

This is the result:

Image

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:48 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5161
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
They already have faster and more reliable speeds than a lot of people in rural locations. They should accept the design or go without.


Speaking of rural locations, what about all those pylons that create an eyesore in our great British countryside?


Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:01 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
forquare1 wrote:
belchingmatt wrote:
They already have faster and more reliable speeds than a lot of people in rural locations. They should accept the design or go without.


Speaking of rural locations, what about all those pylons that create an eyesore in our great British countryside?

Are they an eyesore or must we keep the countryside in a permanent state of stasis based on a prewar ideal.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
There was a competition last year for a new design of pylon. Won by a Danish company iirc.

When people complain about blights on the landscape, perhaps I'll pay more attention when they give up cars, electricity, trains, running water, and perhaps everything else that requires infrastructure.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5161
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
forquare1 wrote:
belchingmatt wrote:
They already have faster and more reliable speeds than a lot of people in rural locations. They should accept the design or go without.


Speaking of rural locations, what about all those pylons that create an eyesore in our great British countryside?

Are they an eyesore or must we keep the countryside in a permanent state of stasis based on a prewar ideal.


Perhaps not an eyesore, but certainly not things of beauty, or in keeping, IMO.

belchingmatt wrote:
There was a competition last year for a new design of pylon. Won by a Danish company iirc.

When people complain about blights on the landscape, perhaps I'll pay more attention when they give up cars, electricity, trains, running water, and perhaps everything else that requires infrastructure.


And this is my point. These grey boxes are needed to support the infrastructure. Put them in and get on with it.

EDIT: Or is this all very much "not in my backyard"...?


Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:24 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.