Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
William Hague: 'powerful case' for EU referendum 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
People don't vote for stuff on the basis of facts or arguments, political debate is nearly always based on emotional appeals which cannot sensibly be reflected in policy because their purpose is not to explain an actual course of action, it is to persuade voters that a set of politicians share their view of the world.

For democracy to work properly it must be two sided - with politicians telling the truth to a populace who are interested in being told it. We aren't, they don't, and we consistently reward the biggest liars with the best jobs, so nobody comes out of it smelling too good if you really look at the process.

The euro debate is a case in point - on a grand scale. Both sides of the debate have been hijacked by utopian fantasists with simplistic mythologies to peddle. The EU is a mess because a series of German politicians have hoped against all evidence that they can inculcate their tardy neighbours with some kind of work ethic, but they have been consistently outmanoeuvred by Frenchmen and Italians clinging to a pathetic notion that everything can be kept exactly as it is forever if you close your eyes and wish real hard.

Our Eurosceptics think we're the only people who care about doing anything properly, they are prisoners of a delusion that we would unleash a mighty torrent of entrepreneurialism if only we would make it easier to sack people and harder to avoid deportation. And our Europhiles think much the same way as the Germans, except with an extra topping of fatalism that we are some kind of insignificant little island that must cling to the Euro skirt for protection (handily getting their excuses in early). European Anglosceptics think that if we bugger off that means they won't lose out, and Anglophiles (some of those euro guys are actually glad to have us around) think that our obstreperous tendencies can be curbed and we can actually become good neighbours.

All of those people are deluded. Especially the last set.


All of this not helped by our media who prefer to peddle the “Crazy EU Banana Rule” type stories which do nothing to further the debate, or from people like Farage who are clearly treading on very thin ice when it comes to their views on non-White Christian people. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... -veil.html

The problem we have is that we can never have a proper debate about our involvement in Europe because there is too much prejudice and propaganda floating about to allow an informed decision. Really, instead of a referendum, we need some form of enquiry - far reaching and broad to examine the pros and cons of being in such an entity. I know this seems like crazy talk, but I think we need this to be examined impartially and as fairly as possible. I don’t think a slanging match between various Europhiles and phone is going to do us any good at all. A cold, dispassionate hard look at the subject is required - something that separates the wheat from the chaff.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:39 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
Imagine if we started doing that sort of thing for real, we could base our immigration policies on data instead of sublimated racism; defence on what threats we face instead of what BAE wants us to subsidise. We might even decide whether our crime and justice policies were directed towards reducing crime or taking vengeance.

But would it be democratic? If the majority want policies that are, in the final analysis, very mild nazi delusions, is it right or wrong to let them have them?


Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:53 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
ShockWaffle wrote:
But would it be democratic? If the majority want policies that are, in the final analysis, very mild nazi delusions, is it right or wrong to let them have them?

If want democracy yes it is right.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:52 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
Perhaps so. In which case perhaps education reform should be higher up the agenda. We are the consumers in a political marketplace where packages of policy and dogma are waved at us by cheesy salesmen. Like those Barclays customers who bought the wrong inflation hedging policies, we place ourselves the mercy of the mis-sellers unless we tool up to understand the offers and read the fine print.


Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:24 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.