... as it as cool as an iPad
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-0 ... ablet.html

The Galaxy tablets “do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design,” [Judge Colin] Birss said. “They are not as cool.”

The design for three Galaxy tablets doesn’t infringe Apple’s registered design, Judge Colin Birss said today in London in a court fight between the world’s two biggest makers of smartphones. Consumers aren’t likely to get the tablet computers mixed up, he said.

wow some common sense!!

... as it not as cool as an iPad
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-0 ... ablet.html

Edit: missed a vital word out

Apple sued Motorola for allegedly infringing three Ipad design patents with its Xoom tablet in a bid to get the device removed from shelves across Europe. However Apple lost in court against the Android 3.0 Honeycomb tablet, because with its quirky angular edges and black plastic back panel the Motorola Xoom looks nothing like the Apple Ipad.
The Inquirer (http://s.tt/1i9ni)

Today, Bloomberg reports that the same judge has put in yet another twist in this case. Judge Colin Birss has ordered Apple to purchase and run ads in a number of UK-based newspaper and magazines that dispel the idea that the Galaxy Tab is a copy of the iPad. In effect, Apple has been ordered to pay for and run ads for Samsung's Galaxy Tab.

The newspapers and magazines that will feature these ads include the Financial Times, the Daily Mail, the Guardian Mobile magazine, and T3. The ruling also ordered Apple to post a notice about the court's decision on its website and keep it live for six months. It's an order that obviously didn't sit well with Apple's lawyer Richard Hacon. He told the court today, “No company likes to refer to a rival on its website."

Apple has already said it plans to appeal the original ruling earlier this month, so it may be a little while before UK residents see these rather embarrassing ads.

They’ll drop it on their newly acquired apple.co.uk domain, which no one will go to. I doubt that many people got to apple.com/uk apart from the store section.

They'll have to be careful, the Court won't be too pleased if the message doesn't get significant prominence.