Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Patent work around to a previous Patent? 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
clicky

Quote:
Apple's first slide-to-unlock patent was granted in 2010, its second in 2011, and on cue version 3.0 was just dropped on us. US patent number 8,286,103 issued yesterday and, as expected, it's even broader than the first two. The '103 patent moves past the limiting language of the first two patents that required that the unlock image move along a predefined path, or that it at least start and stop at predefined locations on the screen. The '103 patent now broadly covers continuously moving an image to a general unlock region on the screen to unlock the device....

...Heavy use of the predefined verbiage in the first two patents left the door open for competitors — namely Android OEMs — to implement unlock features that would likely avoid the patents. We saw Samsung, LG, HTC, and likely even Google beginning with stock Ice Cream Sandwich, come up with workarounds to Apple's patents. While some of the competition is still arguably sidestepping the coverage of the '103 patent with their previous workarounds — such as HTC with its lack of a distinct "unlock region" — others may need to look at yet another design tweak to avoid locking horns with Apple in the future.


_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:11 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
There was a unlock screen on one phone that used a multi swipe unlock. There will be alternatives to the slide to unlock.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:54 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
Face unlock FTW.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:53 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
That you can patent it in the first place is ridiculous.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:55 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
That you can patent it in the first place is ridiculous.

I do see what you mean, but it does impact the look and feel of the device. I have seen alternative screen locks, which could be good alternatives and more secure. By forcing others to use other solutions that are different and not patented.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:22 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
pcernie wrote:
That you can patent it in the first place is ridiculous.

I do see what you mean, but it does impact the look and feel of the device. I have seen alternative screen locks, which could be good alternatives and more secure. By forcing others to use other solutions that are different and not patented.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.


I'd like to see a clear distinction made between a basic act and the technology/software involved - I'm guessing the tech side of it isn't 'something new' if you're somewhat patenting the act itself? :?

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:46 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
I'd like to see a clear distinction made between a basic act and the technology/software involved - I'm guessing the tech side of it isn't 'something new' if you're somewhat patenting the act itself? :?

I agree with you. The whole concept of patenting designs seems strange. Though I can appreciate the whole look and feel design reason for patents. Otherwise Samsung would simply copy Apple verbatim on some of its phones.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:37 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Regulators demand patent licence clarification

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19904713

About time, get to bloody work on it.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:45 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.