Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Apple Apology 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
While I can't find the word 'sorry' anywhere in this body of text, here's what Apple was ordered to do regarding the Apple vs. Samsung case when the judge ruled that Apple had no grounds for the lawsuit in the UK.

Apparently this will also appear in the printed press, using text that is no smaller than 14pts.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:21 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
I'll believe it when I see it, frankly.


Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:35 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
I'll believe it when I see it, frankly.

Hell is reported to be be still toasty hot

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:38 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Apparently this will also appear in the printed press, using text that is no smaller than 14pts.

I wonder if it has to have a constant font size. Double page spread in the national press...

Quote:
On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Pat ... /1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."

"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back.
They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:40 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Is this the computer industry equivalent of the Viz "Thieving Gypsy Bastards" controversy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viz_(comic)#Controversy

I recall Viz's apology being as legally close to what was required. They also printed a strip named "Nice Honest Gypsies" next to the apology.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:52 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Rather inconspicuous link on Apple's UK web page leads here :- http://www.apple.com/uk/legal-judgement/

doesn't sound like they're feeling particularly contrite, does it?


Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:23 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
Yeah I read it earlier today.

Makes me wonder if the judge will consider them in contempt and haul them back into court ?

_________________
Image


Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:36 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
JohnSheridan wrote:
Yeah I read it earlier today.

Makes me wonder if the judge will consider them in contempt and haul them back into court ?

If and its a big If then they will learn the hard way not to piss of a judge. But im assuming that they will have pushed it to the limit but not crossed the contempt line.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:55 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
I suspect they've complied with the letter if not the spirit of the ruling.

Still, if I was the presiding judge I'd take a pretty dim view of the 'apology'. If they're going to be that p!ssy about it I'd be rather more explicit in what they had to do to apologise down to the specific text, where, what size and for how long it had to be visible on the website. There would also be a penalty clause painful enough to make them sit up and take notice if they failed to comply.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:31 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Rather inconspicuous link on Apple's UK web page leads here :- http://www.apple.com/uk/legal-judgement/

doesn't sound like they're feeling particularly contrite, does it?
Did you even click the link in the OP? (8+D

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:02 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Did you even click the link in the OP? (8+D

Mark

tbh I didn't even notice it until now...

As to penalty clauses, the penalty for contempt of court goes up to a very significant jail sentence. I wouldn't want to be the head of Apple UK if it gets to court.


Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:59 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
I suspect they've complied with the letter if not the spirit of the ruling.

Still, if I was the presiding judge I'd take a pretty dim view of the 'apology'. If they're going to be that p!ssy about it I'd be rather more explicit in what they had to do to apologise down to the specific text, where, what size and for how long it had to be visible on the website. There would also be a penalty clause painful enough to make them sit up and take notice if they failed to comply.

Hm, I think they might entice the ire of the court with their last paragraph - the implication being that the English courts reached the wrong conclusion.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Fri Oct 26, 2012 11:43 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 603
Location: Durham, UK
Reply with quote
Image

Not real, but amusing (i found so at least).


Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:13 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
vdbswong wrote:
Image

Not real, but amusing (i found so at least).

Yes but why wasn't it in Comic Sans? ;)

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:26 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Not even Apple are that evil.


Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:48 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.