Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Samsung printers contain hardcoded backdoor account, US-CERT 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Samsung printers contain hardcoded backdoor account, US-CERT warns

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9234079/Samsung_printers_contain_hardcoded_backdoor_account_US_CERT_warns

Quote:
Printers manufactured by Samsung have a backdoor administrator account hard coded in their firmware that could enable attackers to change their configuration, read their network information or stored credentials and access sensitive information passed to them by users.

The hardcoded account does not require authentication and can be accessed over the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) interface of the affected printers, the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) said in a security advisory.

SNMP is an Internet protocol commonly used to monitor and read statistics from network-attached devices.

The SNMP account found in Samsung printers has full read and write permissions and remains accessible even if SNMP is disabled using the printer's management utility, US-CERT said.

"Secondary impacts include: the ability to make changes to the device configuration, access to sensitive information (e.g., device and network information, credentials, and information passed to the printer), and the ability to leverage further attacks through arbitrary code execution," the organization said.

It's not just Samsung-branded printers that contain the administrative account, but also some Dell-branded printers manufactured by Samsung.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:02 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Remind me again, is SNMP a routable protocol? If it isn't, you'd actually have to be on the same network segment as the printer to access the data.

Jon


Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:04 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Remind me again, is SNMP a routable protocol? If it isn't, you'd actually have to be on the same network segment as the printer to access the data.

Not sure what you mean there. SNMP goes over TCP/IP so it's routable, but you'd still need a route to get to it. Also, the article implies that it's not SNMP that's the problem per say. It's that the SNMP user has full access rights to the admin interface.

I doubt many people arbitrarily port-forward to their printers so an external attack isn't that likely, but it's still a bit naff to have a hard-coded back door. Naff... but not unusual!

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:02 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
Remind me again, is SNMP a routable protocol? If it isn't, you'd actually have to be on the same network segment as the printer to access the data.

Not sure what you mean there. SNMP goes over TCP/IP so it's routable, but you'd still need a route to get to it. Also, the article implies that it's not SNMP that's the problem per say. It's that the SNMP user has full access rights to the admin interface.

There are routing protocols, routed protocols and non-routed protocols. I thought SNMP might be one of the non-routed protocols but it appears I was mistaken.

JJW009 wrote:
I doubt many people arbitrarily port-forward to their printers so an external attack isn't that likely, but it's still a bit naff to have a hard-coded back door. Naff... but not unusual!

Sadly, with the growth of 'the cloud' it's increasingly the case that firms are making connected devices like printers and NAS boxes more internet visible than you might expect. You'd assume a sysadmin would insist on them being blocked at the perimeter and external access only via VPN but sadly some firms don't actually have a sysadmin (they just get in contract IT help as and when) and sometimes the sysadmin gets over-ruled by someone high enough up in the business hierarchy.

I suspect there are far more of the printers that are vulnerable to this exploit visible on the internet than either of us would hope.

Jon


Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:05 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
I suspect there are far more of the printers that are vulnerable to this exploit visible on the internet than either of us would hope.

The series of coincidences and absurd decisions required to end up with a public IP forwarding unfiltered SNMP traffic to a Samsung printer that is capable of returning the traffic back to the internet, and then for that IP to be known and exploited by a hacker who could be bothered attacking a printer, must be statistically so improbable that I would be amazed if any ever gets hacked.

Conversely, there are probably millions that are sitting on LANs right now with no password on their web interfaces.


Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:53 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
I do actually remember reading an article recently about someone who's printer started producing reams of junk. I can't for the life of me remember exactly what the cause was exactly, but I do have vague recollections of it being "cloud" related and malicious.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:53 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
This one?

This one is also interesting.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:09 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
This one?

This one is also interesting.

I think the first one is probably the virus in the story I read.

The second story is well worth a read, and specifically relevant to this thread is this one quote:

Quote:
A quick scan of unprotected printers left open to Internet attack by the researchers found 40,000 devices that they said could be infected within minutes

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:42 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Jon's second law : It's impossible to over-estimate the stupidity of people once they connect to the internet.


Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:11 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.