Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
UK prepares for further flooding as downpours continue 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Cares were owed by the masses by 1927 as that was the end date of production of the Model T Ford. There were plenty of manufacturers around by then. Also driving licenses were around from 1903 and tests became mandatory in 1934. My Grandfather already had a car by that point so never took a test. So cars were common place, though possibly not as much as now. So house designs would have included cars. By the date that Le Corbusier designed the house cars were common.

I do agree that homes should be built with flood resistance in mind, but that would hit builders profit margins, and with homes already very expensive, most buyers could not afford them if they were included.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:25 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
There would undoubtedly be a cost for making more flood resistant properties but if the required features were fairly standard then economies of scale would bring costs down rather rapidly. No house builder is likely to include such features on a whim unless they are being paid directly by the customer to include them so it would require changes to building regulations to make a minimum level of flood proofing mandatory in the same way that things like insulation are now.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:32 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
Not everywhere has hills.

If planning committees and councils weren't so bloody minded and attached to some idyll of the British Village, we'd have houses like this and the flood problems would be much reduced.

Image

Yep, complete with helipad on the roof for those essential Tesco grocery deliveries. ;)

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:48 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:38 am
Posts: 2967
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Reply with quote
Building a home is rather cheap, it's the land cost that's the problem.

_________________
I've finally invented something that works!

A Mac User.


Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:49 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Where I live, the land is about a third of the total cost of building a new house (average family house). We looked into it, when we bought our house. But finding a decent plot of land in a good position was difficult, so we ended up buying an old house. That said, what we saved over building new, we have spent on renovating the old house... :?

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:37 am
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.