http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21978341

Might need to pour yourself a cuppa to read through that one

So err.. he can't get a divorce because the Judge believes he's a technically a woman and same sex marriages are illegal in that state? Isn't that therefore a defacto divorce anyway? Isn't the judge actually saying 'you can't have a divorce because you're not actually married'? In which case what's the problem?

Sod the cup of tea, try a few aspirin.

Won't anyone think of the children?

It reminds me of that South Park episode where Cartman's mum is also his dad

Yes the children should come first. They should be granted custody of the house as they will have lots of therapy in the years to come.

In Cartman's case well he is a little [LIFTED] so really deserves that sort of problem.

I think there's a South Park catchphrase that admirably applies - "That's pretty [LIFTED] up right there"

I would never remember that, but it is perfect.