Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Judge says Apple was complicit in price fixing of e-books 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.techradar.com/news/computing ... ks-1154204

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat May 25, 2013 1:09 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I think that Apple simply took a percentage of whatever the publishers wanted to sell the E-books for. Though US law might see it differently.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat May 25, 2013 4:32 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
I think the part about on insisting on a fixed retail price that couldn't be undercut by other retailers will be what get's them.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat May 25, 2013 9:28 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
I think the part about on insisting on a fixed retail price that couldn't be undercut by other retailers will be what get's them.

Yes that is different. If Apple and the publishers did not have that deal then it would not have been an issue.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun May 26, 2013 12:05 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
The whole 'nowhere else cheaper than the apple shop' was widely publicised at the time and, while it's a contract term that can only been as being favourable to Apple over the customer, it's not of itself price fixing, or indeed illegal. Publishers were still free to set their own price and, if they wish, sell their ebooks on other platforms. Apple don't have anything like the market dominance in ebooks they have in online music sales to be able to dictate what publishers charge. In that market it's Amazon who are the four hundred pound gorilla.

What is, IIRC, is under investigation is that cartel of ebook publishers along with Apple conspired to keep the price of ebooks artificially high. Cartel price fixing is illegal. Needless to say the publishers and Apple deny any such thing happened. As I understand it, the evidence is in the 'interesting but not conclusive' bracket.

It's unusual for a judge to be making statements like that in a civil case though. It's almost as if he wants things to go on to an appeal trial so a few of his lawyer friends get to continue picking up immense paychecks.


Sun May 26, 2013 9:57 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I think Amazon are behind this trial as they are the biggest beneficiaries of an end to the Apple deal.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun May 26, 2013 11:00 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
The not cheaper anywhere else is the problem and also bad for customers. It is the same for software on the Apple platform.

If you sell through Apple, they take 30% of the purchase price, if you sell direct and only have a couple of percent for the card fee, you still can't sell it cheaper. That either means you have to rip off your customers, or you have to take a loss on the Apple store version.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon May 27, 2013 3:57 am
Profile ICQ
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
The not cheaper anywhere else is the problem and also bad for customers. It is the same for software on the Apple platform.

If you sell through Apple, they take 30% of the purchase price, if you sell direct and only have a couple of percent for the card fee, you still can't sell it cheaper. That either means you have to rip off your customers, or you have to take a loss on the Apple store version.

Amazon have a similar "not cheaper elsewhere" policy for hosting on its marketplace.

I doubt that small software developers can get a low couple of percent fee for credit card payments, I suspect that many pay more than that. Also cost of delivery will be lower than hosting it yourself, so for developers there will be benefits of allowing Apple to sell it on your behalf. The biggest benefit is if you sold software through a retail chain that you could expect to have to give the retailer a 50% margin if not more, so you could be worse of that way. You might lose sales from multiple purchases when you consider Apples generous usage policy on different machines, but you will save more elsewhere with no advertising etc. It is all swings and roundabouts.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon May 27, 2013 4:44 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
It depends how many copies you sell. Places like Squarespace offer unlimited bandwidth for $18 a month and a couple of percent on card transactions, as well as PayPal etc. If you have a Mac application selling for $10, you need 6 copies to cover your website costs at Apple's rates.

The question is, how discoverable is your website, compared to being buried in an App Store.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Tue May 28, 2013 3:52 am
Profile ICQ
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:

I doubt that small software developers can get a low couple of percent fee for credit card payments, I suspect that many pay more than that.


It costs me less than 3% to do a credit card transaction and I take a very small number of cc payments

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Tue May 28, 2013 7:38 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:

What is, IIRC, is under investigation is that cartel of ebook publishers along with Apple conspired to keep the price of ebooks artificially high. Cartel price fixing is illegal. Needless to say the publishers and Apple deny any such thing happened. As I understand it, the evidence is in the 'interesting but not conclusive' bracket.

.

The publishers all denied it at first and then accepted guilt and settled leaving Apple as the lone defendant. If Apple are found guilty it will be this and the amazing coincidence that they all raised prices to what Apple wanted at the same time. So the consumer lost out.

Iirc as apple are the only defendant now they will be liable for all the potential fines the publishers would have got if they hadn't made bargains, which could lead to very very substantial fines.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Tue May 28, 2013 9:01 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
The whole 'nowhere else cheaper than the apple shop' was widely publicised at the time and, while it's a contract term that can only been as being favourable to Apple over the customer, it's not of itself price fixing, or indeed illegal. Publishers were still free to set their own price and, if they wish, sell their ebooks on other platforms. Apple don't have anything like the market dominance in ebooks they have in online music sales to be able to dictate what publishers charge. In that market it's Amazon who are the four hundred pound gorilla.

What is, IIRC, is under investigation is that cartel of ebook publishers along with Apple conspired to keep the price of ebooks artificially high. Cartel price fixing is illegal. Needless to say the publishers and Apple deny any such thing happened. As I understand it, the evidence is in the 'interesting but not conclusive' bracket.

It's unusual for a judge to be making statements like that in a civil case though. It's almost as if he wants things to go on to an appeal trial so a few of his lawyer friends get to continue picking up immense paychecks.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Tue May 28, 2013 9:04 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
It depends how many copies you sell. Places like Squarespace offer unlimited bandwidth for $18 a month and a couple of percent on card transactions, as well as PayPal etc. If you have a Mac application selling for $10, you need 6 copies to cover your website costs at Apple's rates.

The question is, how discoverable is your website, compared to being buried in an App Store.

Yes that makes a huge difference. Since I find most of my software via mac magazines or mac update rss then if it is of interest to me and I discover it via these methods then they could make a sale. If you get an app picked as a app store staff favourite that can boost sales considerably.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue May 28, 2013 9:14 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.