Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Spending review: Job cuts as Osborne reaches deal with MoD 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23018465

Oh yeah, civilian staff are the big problem at the MOD :roll:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jun 23, 2013 10:06 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23018465
Oh yeah, civilian staff are the big problem at the MOD :roll:

Actually, they kind of are. D'you know how many civilian staff are in the MoD's procurement department?


Sun Jun 23, 2013 4:24 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
pcernie wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23018465
Oh yeah, civilian staff are the big problem at the MOD :roll:

Actually, they kind of are. D'you know how many civilian staff are in the MoD's procurement department?


Is that who we're blaming all the really bad procurement decisions on? ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jun 23, 2013 5:07 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
pcernie wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23018465
Oh yeah, civilian staff are the big problem at the MOD :roll:

Actually, they kind of are. D'you know how many civilian staff are in the MoD's procurement department?

Is that who we're blaming all the really bad procurement decisions on? ;)

Yeah, them. Last I head the MoD's procurement department (technically 'Defence Equipment and Support') had 20,000 staff. Twenty thousand. That's one for every seven members of the armed forces. 'Overstaffed' is a massive understatement.


Sun Jun 23, 2013 5:19 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I agree (I seem to recall an Eye article where, guess what, privatisation was mooted), but is it really taking that many people to make billion pound screw-ups? It's the same deal in terms of senior staff with the services themselves as I understand it.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jun 23, 2013 5:32 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
I agree (I seem to recall an Eye article where, guess what, privatisation was mooted), but is it really taking that many people to make billion pound screw-ups? It's the same deal in terms of senior staff with the services themselves as I understand it.

Oh the armed forces are very top heavy. If I remember correctly we've got more Admirals than ships.


Sun Jun 23, 2013 5:34 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Quote:
Labour said the economy was facing a "difficult few years".

Even Labour have significantly underestimated the severity of the financial crisis. :roll:

I thought that there already have been significant sackings of frontline troops.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun Jun 23, 2013 7:36 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.