Reply to topic  [ 2197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 ... 147  Next
Forum Film Reviews & Recommendations 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
Looks like you can't rank them by my rating, but here's the list in unususable scramble mode anyway, http://www.imdb.com/user/ur7693773/ratings?tab=all
You've only ever watched 851 films?!?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:18 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Nah I keep remembering ones all the time, but I don't actively try to think of all of them, only when I see them on IMDB. Also when you're as picky as me, most films aren't worth watching.

:edit: also that's 19 weeks of solid film watching there.


Last edited by leeds_manc on Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:19 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I'm going to have to go through your list and pick out all the ones I like the look of that I haven't yet seen.
Damn you.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:22 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
This thread has also just reminded me that I haven't yet posted my films list from last year. *sigh*
#FAIL n00b @ me

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:24 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
Nah I keep remembering ones all the time, but I don't actively try to think of all of them, only when I see them on IMDB. Also when you're as picky as me, most films aren't worth watching.

:edit: also that's 19 weeks of solid film watching there.
There's Breaking Bad in that list that you might wanna remove as it's not, y'know, a film. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:28 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Be my guest, bear in mind, I rate "good" films as 6, average films as 5. A 6 rating means I enjoyed it, 7 it was really very good, 8 is starting to move me to tears with how great that film was, 9 gobsmacked, 10, flawless.

They are also rated in the context of their genre, so I think to myself "what was that film TRYING to do?" I'm not a literary/Eastern European art house snob.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:29 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
leeds_manc wrote:
Nah I keep remembering ones all the time, but I don't actively try to think of all of them, only when I see them on IMDB. Also when you're as picky as me, most films aren't worth watching.

:edit: also that's 19 weeks of solid film watching there.
There's Breaking Bad in that list that you might wanna remove as it's not, y'know, a film. (8+)

Mark

And The Wire, and Treme et al, blame IMDB. ;)


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:29 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
leeds_manc wrote:
Nah I keep remembering ones all the time, but I don't actively try to think of all of them, only when I see them on IMDB. Also when you're as picky as me, most films aren't worth watching.

:edit: also that's 19 weeks of solid film watching there.
There's Breaking Bad in that list that you might wanna remove as it's not, y'know, a film. (8+)
And The Wire, and Treme et al, blame IMDB. ;)
Yeah, I just saw Game of Thrones as well.
It's a shame you can't create seperate lists (maybe you can, I haven't tested this myself).

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:31 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
Be my guest, bear in mind, I rate "good" films as 6, average films as 5. A 6 rating means I enjoyed it, 7 it was really very good, 8 is starting to move me to tears with how great that film was, 9 gobsmacked, 10, flawless.
With this in mind, it makes your score for Cloud Atlas even more impressive.
I greatly enjoyed that too.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:34 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
leeds_manc wrote:
Be my guest, bear in mind, I rate "good" films as 6, average films as 5. A 6 rating means I enjoyed it, 7 it was really very good, 8 is starting to move me to tears with how great that film was, 9 gobsmacked, 10, flawless.
With this in mind, it makes your score for Cloud Atlas even more impressive.
I greatly enjoyed that too.

Mark

Cloud Atlas was damn bloody good.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:36 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
leeds_manc wrote:
Be my guest, bear in mind, I rate "good" films as 6, average films as 5. A 6 rating means I enjoyed it, 7 it was really very good, 8 is starting to move me to tears with how great that film was, 9 gobsmacked, 10, flawless.
With this in mind, it makes your score for Cloud Atlas even more impressive.
I greatly enjoyed that too.
Cloud Atlas was damn bloody good.
Preaching to the choir.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:41 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Chris, I've been scanning through and only found one 1-star rating so far, have you seen any films so bad that they don't deserve any stars at all?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:47 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Chris, I've been scanning through and only found one 1-star rating so far, have you seen any films so bad that they don't deserve any stars at all?

Mark


Funnily enough I've considered that, it would have to be in some way "not a film" maybe a blatant propaganda for racism film or something. I wouldn't probably bother rating it.

To get one star a film has to keep you watching till the end, if a film was so bad that I stopped watching, I'd probably give it 2 stars because, 1 star I have to be angry that HANG ON I actually sat through ALL OF THAT [LIFTED].

Only one film has fitted that description perfectly and it is Steven Spielberg's A [LIFTED] I.


Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:50 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Best scene in any film: "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... *Vangelis*"


Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:01 am
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
leeds_manc wrote:
Be my guest, bear in mind, I rate "good" films as 6, average films as 5. A 6 rating means I enjoyed it, 7 it was really very good, 8 is starting to move me to tears with how great that film was, 9 gobsmacked, 10, flawless.
With this in mind, it makes your score for Cloud Atlas even more impressive.
I greatly enjoyed that too.

Mark

Cloud Atlas was damn bloody good.


I saw it over Christmas and enjoyed it too.

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:10 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 ... 147  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.