x404.co.uk - View topic - Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'

View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:12 pm

Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'

Moderators: saspro, HeatherKay, timark_uk, Blue_Nowhere, l3v1ck

Page 1 of 1

[ 5 posts ]

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'

Author

Message

pcernie

Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast

Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014 ... rt-britain

Bias?

But still, I've yet to hear a convincing argument for them once you take into account others' capability, our actual ability and willingness to fire them etc.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/

Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:49 pm

jonbwfc

What's a life?

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040

Re: Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'


	pcernie wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/10/trident-nuclear-fleet-weapons-report-britain Bias?

Yes, in favour of the absolutely bleeding sodding obvious.

Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:41 pm

Amnesia10

Legend

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)

Re: Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'

We could still maintain a nuclear deterrent a far lower cost.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21

Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:23 pm

rustybucket

I haven't seen my friends in so long

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5837

Re: Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'


	Amnesia10 wrote: We could still maintain a nuclear deterrent a far lower cost.

Go on...

_________________
Jim

Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:07 am

ShockWaffle

Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911

Re: Brit nukes 'irrelevant to existing or foreseeable threats'

rustybucket wrote:


	Amnesia10 wrote: We could still maintain a nuclear deterrent a far lower cost.

Go on...

Privatise our nuclear fission delivery services and contract out to DHL.

Or spend that bit extra on Royal Mail and get the added excitement of not entirely knowing who we will blow up.

Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:38 am

Page 1 of 1

[ 5 posts ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum